Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What this judge did would be deemed uber liberal activism. He overturned a law, approved by the VOTERS, by delving into the thought processes of its supporters.
Quote:
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals will decide whether the federal judge who struck down California's ban on same sex marriage last year should have disclosed his long-term relationship with another man.
I can't believe this judge was allowed to hold a "trial" in the first place.
"...with liberty and justice for all". All means everyone !
You've hit the nail on the head. The judges will know that whatever ruling they make will have repercussions beyond extending the right to marrry to homosexuals. So they'll have to ask themselves whether "All means everyone", as you put it and, if it does, are bigamists and polygamists included? It's not as cut-and-dried as you make it out to be.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
