Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Every single case challenging his natural born status has been dismissed based on standing, NOT on the merits.
nope. from ankeny v daniels decision:
"Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are "natural born Citizens" for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."
It's called the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.
Also US Code Title 8, Chapter 12, Subschapter 3, Part 1, § 1401
Not true. Nowhere does the 14th mention natural born Citizen. Obama is a citizen but he's not a Article 2 Section 1 NBC. Please quit trying to mislead the posters here on behalf of the usurper.
Georgia case could determine whether Obama’s name may be placed on 2012 state ballot…ANY 2012 state ballot!
Defendant Obama's Kenyan blood must be boiling over this lawsuit.
"The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens.
Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.
These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
Defendant Obama does not meet the natural born citizen definition.
JUSTICE GRAY MISQUOTED McCREERY V. SOMERVILLE AND THE RELEVANT STATUTE.
"Grab a cup of java, put your thinking caps on, kick back and relax. We are going to be here for a while. Focus. Below, you will be privy to a true and proper revision of United States Supreme Court history." This is related to the faulty Wong Kim Ark decision.
2. The legal case is in a state court in Georgia so it for sure could not affect federal elections throughout the country.
3. There is a solid motion to dismiss the case which will be heard later this month.
"The hen is the wisest of all the animal creation because she never cackles until after the egg has been laid." A. Lincoln
On January 3, 2012 Judge Malihi denied defendant Obama’s motion to dismiss.
Have no idea why you're quoting a murderer and tyrant named Lincoln. He was responsible for the slaughter and starvation of millions of people and countless hens.
That's all I got to say about this birther thread. Fess up. You just don't like Obama because he has different ideas than yourself and/or is a Democrat, and can't stand that MOST AMERICANS DISAGREED WITH YOU.
That's all I got to say about this birther thread. Fess up. You just don't like Obama because he has different ideas than yourself and/or is a Democrat, and can't stand that MOST AMERICANS DISAGREED WITH YOU.
Actually he dislikes him because Obama is black and OP has stated that only Anglo Saxons can be natural born citizens and therefore president.
You just don't like Obama because he has different ideas than yourself and/or is a Democrat,.....
or it could have something to do with dragging canoe's belief that only anglo-saxons can be "natural born citizens".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Georgia case could determine whether Obama’s name may be placed on 2012 state ballot…ANY 2012 state ballot!
