Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,826,620 times
Reputation: 699

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
No pickle. He'll just present his birth certificate. And the hearing will be over.
Nonsense.

A birth certificate cannot make perpetual inhabitant obama Constitutionally qualified. It does not matter if the bc is valid or invalid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:17 PM
 
4,911 posts, read 3,430,619 times
Reputation: 1257
And are Democrats preparing to file suit against the Republican nominee, filing appeal after appeal after appeal? They're damn fools if they don't
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:17 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv View Post
The "he has to show his BC" argument has already been struck down in an earlier civil trial
By a different court, and this isnt about his Birth Certificate, this is the case that should have moved forward INSTEAD of the birth certificate one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:19 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
 
n/a posts
What a waste of time and money.

Also, about that 19th century decision, here's the text:

MINOR V. HAPPERSETT, 88 U. S. 162 :: Volume 88 :: 1874 :: Full Text :: US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez

Could we please refrain from making things up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:21 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
2,953 posts, read 5,296,264 times
Reputation: 1731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McGarrett View Post
Just so no one is confused here, the case is NOT about a Birth Certificate.
And what happens when this case doesn't result Declaring Obama ineligible for the presidency or not a Natural Born Citizen? Will you admit you are wrong then? How many times must your kind be laughed out of court, or outright dismissed, before you get an inkling that maybe, just maybe, you may be wrong about this?

Maybe then you will finally admit to yourself why you are so eager to believe such completely ridiculous garbage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,826,620 times
Reputation: 699
Obama is going to have to argue that US v. WKA decision gave him natural born citizenship status in front of a court, but first Obama should prove and establish that he was born in the US as that has not happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:27 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
Obama is going to have to argue that US v. WKA decision gave him natural born citizenship status in front of a court
He won't be able to do that. The WKA decision didn't even give WKA natural born citizenship.
Quote:
but first Obama should prove and establish that he was born in the US as that has not happened.
Based on the forged/altered BCs he's publicly released to date, that seems to be true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,826,620 times
Reputation: 699
From

"Attorney Mark Hatfield on behalf of Plaintiffs Kevin Powell and Carl Swensson filed a motion for severance and for separate hearing"

-snip-

"Until the moving party produces evidence or materials which prima facie pierce the pleadings of the opposing party, no duty rests upon the opposing party to produce counter evidence or materials in affirmative supporting of its side of the issue as made by the pleadings. See, eg., Guthrie v. Monumental Properties, Inc. ..."

-end snip-

Perpetual inhabitant obama must be in panic mode....Michelle sedated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:28 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,568,283 times
Reputation: 6324
So, conservatives, knock Obama out.

That only assures Democrats a victory when Hillary runs in his place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:29 PM
 
49 posts, read 37,909 times
Reputation: 38
This is it, the beginning of the end for Obummer!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top