Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not going to call the poster out for "typical liberal deflection"?
Typical LLMG hypocrisy
Yup..they are totally against this....until that piece of paper reaches his desk then that pen just takes over.
He says one thing and does another. His words are untrustworthy.
Yup..they are totally against this....until that piece of paper reaches his desk then that pen just takes over.
He says one thing and does another. His words are untrustworthy.
You are absolutely right. If they pass it, he will sign it. I doubt he even knows where the VETO stamp is.
That whole copyright thingy has gotten out of hand, copyright has become an obstacle.
And oftentimes it is not even the original author of whatever is copyrighted that lives on the fees and makes a fuss, but some parasite in between author and audience, for instance record labels, studios, and publishing houses.
That whole copyright thingy has gotten out of hand, copyright has become an obstacle.
And oftentimes it is not even the original author of whatever is copyrighted that lives on the fees and makes a fuss, but some parasite in between author and audience, for instance record labels, studios, and publishing houses.
My view is that copyright should be more like medicine. If you perform an original work of art, it should be exclusive to your license for a period of time. Maybe 10 years. After that time, it should belong to the public in a "generic" form. If it is sold or performed by others, you would still get a cut but could not dictate the price any longer.
My view is that copyright should be more like medicine. If you perform an original work of art, it should be exclusive to your license for a period of time. Maybe 10 years. After that time, it should belong to the public in a "generic" form. If it is sold or performed by others, you would still get a cut but could not dictate the price any longer.
I don't know about the details yet, but I do think copyright laws need to be reformed, just like patents laws.
they heard about the plan by BIG INTERNET, HUGE INTERNET websites, to have a day of blackout....
that's the ONLY REASON
THE ONLY REASON they are saying they aren't going to pass it.
Some people, not naming any names, are so gullible that they actually think O isn't going to sign it b.c they realized it was a "bad" bill...
LMAO, they just don't want the public to learn about what they WERE GOING TO pass under their noses. But when the big internet sites would make the information available to TENS OF MILLIONS of people, they changed their mind.
Some people have no street smarts or just blindly listen to the garbage they are fed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
