Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2012, 05:11 PM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,230,482 times
Reputation: 3225

Advertisements

We all know how every Republican out there likes to compare themselves to the popular president Ronald Reagan, but would any Republican consider Eisenhower to be a model Republican? Under Eisenhower our government pushed for all kinds of social programs, including infrastructure, social security, education, desegregation. Sure he was a bit of a war president with the Korean war and all but he pushed for a better America.

Given that a few years ago we had the bridge collapse in MN and our infrastructure overall got rated a "D", I think we need BOTH a president and congress that focus more on the physical and economic aspect of government. I think we have the bailouts approached the wrong way, where a good chunk of money went into the personal accounts of CEO's instead expansion businesses and products. Too much focus is being put on Tax Cuts, Deficit, Abortion, Religion, and the War on Terror. What about innovation, restoration, and expansion?

Republicans keep talking about keeping money in the hands of the "Job Creators" but when are we going to some job creation? When are we going to see some education for the innovators for the 21st century? When are we going to see jobs that helps rebuild America from it's "D" rated infrastructure?

When are we gonna see Republicans emulate Ike, rather than Reagan?

I doubt we'll ever see that from the current crop of both Republicans, if anything they'd call Ike a socialist, the Devil, left-wing scum, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2012, 05:14 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,105,768 times
Reputation: 4828
Highest marginal income tax rate under Eisenhower: 92% (what's it now, 35%).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 05:19 PM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,230,482 times
Reputation: 3225
I understand the tax rate was pretty damn high for the corporations, but his policies and what he focused on during his term are pretty close to what we need to focus on now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 05:26 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,105,768 times
Reputation: 4828
Eisenhower couldn't run as a Republican these days. They'd deride him as a radical liberal communist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 05:42 PM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,230,482 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Eisenhower couldn't run as a Republican these days. They'd deride him as a radical liberal communist.
I know they would, but he still ran as a republican and won by 57% of the popular vote.

Why did the republicans switch their ideals in such a big way from Eisenhower to Reagan if our nation was clearly pretty damn prosperous with the Republican ideals from way back then? Why does the republican base turn away from the key issues that Eisenhower tackled and now focus on Corporations and Religion? Can some republican tell me what went wrong with Eisenhower's republican platform and why we have today's republican platform being what it is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 06:21 PM
 
Location: NC
4,100 posts, read 4,518,405 times
Reputation: 1372
Eisenhower>>>>Reagan imo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 06:44 PM
 
17,815 posts, read 25,645,499 times
Reputation: 36278
Eisenhower when he was a general in WW2 helped liberate the concentration camps, and he was the one who said "film this otherwise the world will never believe it".

He was smart enough to know most people wouldn't comphrend what happened without proof.

There are no more Eisenhowers or JFKs around these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,321,730 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNEwx_46 View Post
Eisenhower>>>>Reagan imo.
Reagan>>>>>Eisenhower IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 07:08 PM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,230,482 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Reagan>>>>>Eisenhower IMO.
Back-up your opinion please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 08:14 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,954,385 times
Reputation: 2938
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNEwx_46 View Post
Eisenhower>>>>Reagan imo.

ditto.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top