Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-17-2012, 07:59 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzards27 View Post
There is no hidding from the FACT that women doing the same job with the same education and experience are paid less.
Then you are reading the wrong studies from the wrong sources.
Such as? It wouldn't surprise me if there was still some gender bias but it's completely overblown. Having said that I reacall reading an article when all things were considered it was the women outpacing the men.


Quote:
Liberty is a "source" that is willing to shape studies and data to fit preconceived results to support their agenda.
Actually I haven't read this, my knowledge of this goes back a few years. This isn't some opinion I've formed overnight or because of one article. I think about year ago there was same topic that came up over NYT article, same thing there, they were using averaged data over the whole population. That's what the 75% represents you often hear mentioned, averaged pay scales regardless of experience, career, education etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-17-2012, 08:02 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA View Post
Besides that, women tend to be more heavily distributed in the "soft" majors which pay less. Look at any engineering department on a college campus and you will see far more men. These men graduate, get higher paying jobs, which then increase the overall average salaries for males.
And that still doesn't explain why the women in that same engineering department go out and get jobs and are paid consistently less than men. That doesn't explain why women who become surgeons, who have the same academic accomplishments, who have the same experience, who have the same skills, are consistently paid less than men.

The studies show that women are paid less CONSISTENTLY, regardless of career, regardless of experience, regardless if they take time off to have children or not. And that would logically be a result of gender inequality in pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2012, 08:06 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865
Here's a question, since we often hear the argument about corporations seeking ways to pay the lowest amount why do we not see an overwhelming majority of women represented in these jobs? Seems that argument gets turned on it's head doesn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2012, 08:09 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
Women earn less because they work less and take more time off to tend to family "issues". Men are deemed more RELIABLE and thus are valued more.
Whoa, Nellie (or should I say, "Buster"?) !!

Women are not out having kids for the entirety of their careers. Really career-oriented women have a baby, take a maternity leave; a couple years later have another baby, take another mat. leave, and are then in the work force for the next 30-35 years.

As far as reliablility, Margaret Thatcher said:

“If you want something said, ask a man...if you want something done, ask a woman.â€

Margaret Thatcher quotes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2012, 08:09 AM
 
78,432 posts, read 60,613,724 times
Reputation: 49733
Depends on the field and the company's culture and so forth.

For example, women models get paid more....but *generally* women athletes make less.

Men tend to still occupy a lot of upper management and lucrative sales jobs too.

I work in a field with LOTS of women in it....the top3-4 people I work for are all women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2012, 08:11 AM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,623,920 times
Reputation: 1544
Most of these "studies" I have seen are filled with bias. They cherrypick the average of this, the median of that, to reach conclusions that aren't necessarily true.

The bottom line is that men are more motivated than women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2012, 08:13 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Here's a question, since we often hear the argument about corporations seeking ways to pay the lowest amount why do we not see an overwhelming majority of women represented in these jobs? Seems that argument gets turned on it's head doesn't it?
Wal-Mart class-action suit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2012, 08:21 AM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,575 posts, read 28,673,621 times
Reputation: 25170
The idea that women make less money than men for the same work is actually an ideological attack on the work and efforts of men.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2012, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,202,822 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunks_galore View Post
If you would bother to do 30 seconds of research on the subject instead of resorting to idle speculation or the youtube videos of buffoons you would see that the answer is yes. Women earn less money than men for the same work.

The Income Disparity of Women in the Creative Class - Jobs & Economy - The Atlantic Cities

Women in top-paying jobs still make less than men - Apr. 20, 2010

http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpswom2009.pdf
Good links, funny that some will ignore facts and cling to agenda driven drivel and their preconceived biases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2012, 08:38 AM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,623,920 times
Reputation: 1544
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzards27 View Post
Good links, funny that some will ignore facts and cling to agenda driven drivel and their preconceived biases.
How were those good links? I read the first one, from the atlantic, and it was typical innumerate bullsh*t that only gives you their small picture of what the data means.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top