Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-17-2012, 10:20 AM
 
3,498 posts, read 2,218,190 times
Reputation: 646

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Would you say it's safe to assume that those who took the test scored as high as they possibly could? Please explain how hiring those with the highest scores doesn't make sense.
It doesn't make sense that in the past they didn't do that. Now all of a sudden they want to raise the bar? Not to mention that the tops candidates were not necessasrily chosen, the hired candidates were chosen randomly from a list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2012, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,346,222 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by nighttrain55 View Post
I'm not saying that hiring the people with the highest score doesn't make sense. What I'm saying is, they should have told the candidates at the beginning of the hiring process that they were taking the highest scores. The City DID NOT TELL THE CANDIDATES THEY WERE ONLY CONSIDERING PEOPLE WHO GOT AN 89 OR HIGHER BEFORE THEY DECIDED TO TAKE THE EXAM. That is the issue. What is so hard to understand? The city ONLY decided to look at people with 89 or above once the exams were complete. That looks suspicious.
Ok....help me understand. How many white candidates who scored under 89 are now being hired or receive monetary compensation for not originally being hired?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 10:29 AM
 
3,417 posts, read 3,073,152 times
Reputation: 1241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Ok....help me understand. How many white candidates who scored under 89 are now being hired or receive monetary compensation for not originally being hired?
did they sue? no they didn't. If they did sue, they would have won also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 10:33 AM
 
3,417 posts, read 3,073,152 times
Reputation: 1241
For all you white people on this forum who have an issue with this, you are going to have to understand, when you do something that appears racially motivated, whether it was intentional or not, we are going to call you out on it. Until white people are no longer the majority and aren't the major power, this is the world you live in. Affirmative Action will not go away until racism is gone, or you aren't in power, whichever comes first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 10:47 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightflight View Post
I think they should hire in the order testing shows candidates to be most qualified, black, white, yellow, red, purple, green, whatever. It's time we truly have EQUAL opportunity hiring.

Last edited by burdell; 02-17-2012 at 10:59 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Steeler Nation
6,897 posts, read 4,752,340 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by nighttrain55 View Post
They should have told the candidates that from the beginning. When you do it after the exams are taken, it gives the appearance that they were trying to exclude blacks.
Maybe in blacks eyes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Steeler Nation
6,897 posts, read 4,752,340 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by nighttrain55 View Post
did they sue? no they didn't. If they did sue, they would have won also.
Well, geez, maybe it is discriminitory they excluded white people from the suit, did anybody ask if they wanted to be included.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Steeler Nation
6,897 posts, read 4,752,340 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by nighttrain55 View Post
For all you white people on this forum who have an issue with this, you are going to have to understand, when you do something that appears racially motivated, whether it was intentional or not, we are going to call you out on it. Until white people are no longer the majority and aren't the major power, this is the world you live in. Affirmative Action will not go away until racism is gone, or you aren't in power, whichever comes first.
Well, maybe if the underclass ghetto blacks would quit acting like idiots, it would be easier for whites not to be racist. Don't you see how his class of blacks is causing a negative impact on blacks in general.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,346,222 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by nighttrain55 View Post
did they sue? no they didn't. If they did sue, they would have won also.
LMAO- thanks for participating in this thread. It was good for a laugh. They would have won what? The contents of door #3?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:02 AM
 
3,417 posts, read 3,073,152 times
Reputation: 1241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452 View Post
Maybe in blacks eyes.
I guess those eyes are good enough because they won the lawsuit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top