Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,566,757 times
Reputation: 4262

Advertisements

This small program tests for illness causing pathogens in fresh produce. The reason stated for the cut, is that it doesn't fit with the marketing division. The cut will save a whopping $5 million dollars. Now this service will be relegated to the states or producers themselves. Does this make any sense?

Obama Budget Cuts Bacteria Testing For Produce

Quote:
"We don't test produce," said Lola Russell, a CDC spokeswoman. "That's just not part of our mission."
State health departments are already facing tough choices as they try to come up with enough dollars to keep food safe after tens thousands of employees have been laid off in recent years. And the FDA has always been crunched for food safety dollars, receiving so little money for food inspections that some facilities are only inspected every five to 10 years. A new food safety law President Obama signed last year aims to increase the number of inspections in the United States and abroad, but emphasizes prevention rather than increased testing of foods.
Obama's budget cuts bacteria testing in produce | US National Headlines | Comcast (http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-national/20120216/US.Obama.Budget.Food.Safety/?cid=hero_media - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:04 AM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,532,697 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
This small program tests for illness causing pathogens in fresh produce. The reason stated for the cut, is that it doesn't fit with the marketing division. The cut will save a whopping $5 million dollars. Now this service will be relegated to the states or producers themselves. Does this make any sense?

Obama Budget Cuts Bacteria Testing For Produce

Obama's budget cuts bacteria testing in produce | US National Headlines | Comcast (http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-national/20120216/US.Obama.Budget.Food.Safety/?cid=hero_media - broken link)
I guess he is trying to appease the tea party Bad move Obama. They will hate you even if taxes stopped and no one was in DC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,566,757 times
Reputation: 4262
Presidents and industry insiders avoid GMOs
The Obama family has wisely opted out of exposing themselves to GM foods by requiring organic--and therefore non-GMO--foods served at the White House. They are even planting an organic garden on the south lawn of the White House, to feature 55 types of vegetables.
The Bush family also had an organic kitchen policy. Laura Bush was "adamant" about it, but kept it all quiet.
Even at Monsanto, many in-the-know employees won't consume the company's own GM creations. Back in 1999, the management of the cafeteria at Monsanto's UK headquarters in High Wycombe, England wrote:
OpEdNews - Article: Will Obama's Food Safety Team Finally Regulate the Biggest Food Safety Hazard of Our Time?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:10 AM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Grow your own. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,830,847 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
This small program tests for illness causing pathogens in fresh produce. The reason stated for the cut, is that it doesn't fit with the marketing division. The cut will save a whopping $5 million dollars. Now this service will be relegated to the states or producers themselves. Does this make any sense?

Obama Budget Cuts Bacteria Testing For Produce

Obama's budget cuts bacteria testing in produce | US National Headlines | Comcast (http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-national/20120216/US.Obama.Budget.Food.Safety/?cid=hero_media - broken link)
Does this regime do anything that make common sense?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:13 AM
 
Location: My little patch of Earth
6,193 posts, read 5,369,433 times
Reputation: 3059
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Grow your own. Problem solved.
For a while, then regulations WILL be enacted to thwart that.

But doncha know a specific group will get a 'farmer' bonus of probably say $50,000.00 or so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:15 AM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Your probably right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top