Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2012, 02:23 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,815,163 times
Reputation: 4896

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Harry isn't tabling all bills. NDAA flew through Congress.
There's agreement and bipartisanship when there needs to be.
Exactly. They right wingers keep trying to present off the charts biased bills, then blame the dems that it's their fault for not agreeing with it
Hell the GOP shot down their own bill with the Ryan plan.
The GOP in the house needs to get their heads out of their rears, make some cuts, and present something sane. Not just their typical slash everything except for "their" spending.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2012, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Cape Coral
5,503 posts, read 7,336,961 times
Reputation: 2250
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
Exactly. They right wingers keep trying to present off the charts biased bills, then blame the dems that it's their fault for not agreeing with it
Hell the GOP shot down their own bill with the Ryan plan.
The GOP in the house needs to get their heads out of their rears, make some cuts, and present something sane. Not just their typical slash everything except for "their" spending.
Congress can cut whatever they want and spend whatever they want as per the constitution. Then the Senate can make their own appropriation bill and it is negotiated with the house committee. OR
Harry Reid can just say "scroo you America"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 02:47 PM
 
59,112 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
Exactly. They right wingers keep trying to present off the charts biased bills, then blame the dems that it's their fault for not agreeing with it
Hell the GOP shot down their own bill with the Ryan plan.
The GOP in the house needs to get their heads out of their rears, make some cuts, and present something sane. Not just their typical slash everything except for "their" spending.
I totally disagree wityh ypour assertion, "They right wingers keep trying to present off the charts biased bills, then blame the dems that it's their fault for not agreeing with it "

The way our Constitution is SUPPOSED to work, is the House passes a bill. It goes to the senate. The Senate Majority Leader assigns the bill to the appropriate senate committees for discussion. They can pass it out of committee unchanged or they can amend it or they can dismiss it outright.

Ole Harry won't even let his fellow Senators LOOK at the bills.

Remember, they can amend them ANYWAY THEY WANT. then they go to a conference committee COMPRISED OF MEMBERS FROM BOTH HOUSES.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,861,032 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by rikoshaprl View Post
Harry Reid is promising that there will be no budget again this year for the third year in a row. That is against the law. The House will again produce a budget but Reid will not let it get voted on in the Senate so it will stall there like the other 28 bills to improve our economy.
Of course the democrats will not impeach him so the Republicans must take over the senate to get him out of power. That is the only way to get rid of the gut causing the gridlock in Congress.
What law is that against?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,954,445 times
Reputation: 5661
If you think that you can get 2/3, be my guest. The question of whether what you charge is 'disorderly behavior' is questionable, however.
Quote:
Section 5.

Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner, and under such penalties as each House may provide.

Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
Exactly. They right wingers keep trying to present off the charts biased bills, then blame the dems that it's their fault for not agreeing with it
Hell the GOP shot down their own bill with the Ryan plan.
The GOP in the house needs to get their heads out of their rears, make some cuts, and present something sane. Not just their typical slash everything except for "their" spending.
Well then Tempest68, why are the Dems in the Senate just tabling the bills ?
Why not modify them and present back to the House ?

Bills seem to be going from the House to the Senate and then nothing is done in the Senate. Tabling a bill is not even attempting. Don't table a bill and then cry you can't get anything done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,954,445 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Well then Tempest68, why are the Dems in the Senate just tabling the bills ?
Why not modify them and present back to the House ?

Bills seem to be going from the House to the Senate and then nothing is done in the Senate. Tabling a bill is not even attempting. Don't table a bill and then cry you can't get anything done.
David Waldman explains.

Quote:
The House’s play here was to try to hand their version of the continuing appropriations bill (to keep the government funded and running past the end of the fiscal year on September 30th) to the Senate and then skip town for a one week recess, leaving the Senate with the choice of either accepting their version of the bill, or amending/rejecting it without the House in town to react, which would leave us without a funding bill in place and trigger a government shutdown.

Instead, the Senate moved immediately to table (effectively, to kill) the House-passed version, meaning that the House will still be in session when the news comes back that there’s no longer a live appropriations vehicle out there to avert the shutdown. Some of the votes to table the bill came from of the usual hard right-leaning suspects, which leads me to believe they’re looking to kill two birds with one stone here: 1) to help speed the creation of a crisis, and; 2) to be able to claim they opposed the bill because it didn’t cut enough, as some hardliner Republicans in the House continued to say last night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 03:38 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,815,163 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Well then Tempest68, why are the Dems in the Senate just tabling the bills ?
Why not modify them and present back to the House ?
The GOP has no desire to compromise or come out with a sane budget bill. It makes no sense to keep wasting tax payer funds and congress' time when the right wingers are acting like a bunch of bratty 3 year olds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Bills seem to be going from the House to the Senate and then nothing is done in the Senate. Tabling a bill is not even attempting. Don't table a bill and then cry you can't get anything done.
Plenty has been getting done, they just passed the tax cut for the middle class extension for the rest of the year for example. The dems are willing to bend over backwards for the right wingers, but it's been proven time and time again the right will not touch their oh-so-precious tax cuts to the rich, or handouts to their corporate cronies no matter what. If we want to get the budget back on track, one of the key provisions is to include having the rich pay their fair share. At this point it looks like we just have to wait until the teabaggers hopefully are all voted out in november so we can finally get progress going again in this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,954,445 times
Reputation: 5661
I find the idea of removing a Senator from offices for failing to pass a budget, preposterous. As long as there are continuing resolutions passed to fund the government, a budget is not required constitutionally. So, to remove someone from office that is not required nor an offense would be unprecedented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 04:02 PM
 
Location: Cape Coral
5,503 posts, read 7,336,961 times
Reputation: 2250
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
David Waldman explains.
Nonsense. The House continues to send budget appropriations bills to the senate where they are not acted on. CRs are supposed to be temporary extensions while differences are worked out. Harry doesn't even attempt to work anything out because he doesn't want his members to have to go on record voting against the sound proposals made by the house.
There is no excuse for this behavior. The democrats in the senate are the DO NOTHING CONGRESS that Obama keeps talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top