Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-29-2012, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
do you bill your insurance company for oil changes or other maintenance and repairs to your car? do you send teh insurance company the bill for new tires you put on your car? no you dont. you pay these things out of pocket. that gives you the opportunity to shop around and make the best deal you can to save money.

the same thing can be done with medical care as well. for instance, if your doctor prescribes antibiotics for an infection, you are not going to be taking them long term, and thus you can pay for them out of pocket rather than send the bill to the insurance. you could also deal with the doctor to get a more favorable rate for doctors visits. if you know the price of things, you can shop around and get the best deal you can make, and save money in the long run. that includes saving money on the cost of health insurance.
So freaking what? I have worked in immunization programs for years, public and private. There is plenty of evidence if the immunizations are covered, people are more likely to get them, and in a timely manner. This is the philosophy behind HMOs. An analogous example, sort of, is changing the oil in your car-preventive maintenance. The difference is that you can replace your car if you don't take care of it, but you can't replace your body. There is a lot of evidence that people are more likely to follow the doctor's plan, e.g. take the antibiotics, if they can afford them. Comparisons with car insurance, homeowner's insurance, etc, are just not appropriate.

Quote:
as with auto insurance, once insurance companies were allowed to sell across state lines, and there were a large number of insurance companies selling auto insurance in the states, the price of auto insurance dropped substantially. the same thing would happen with health insurance as well. we have had this discussion before. more competition is always good for the market place.
I'd like to see some evidence for the first statement, and your evidence that the same would happen with health ins. As it is now, the HI companies have all figured out how to do business in "the several states"; they figured out ways around the rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-29-2012, 01:42 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
I'd like to see some evidence for the first statement, and your evidence that the same would happen with health ins. As it is now, the HI companies have all figured out how to do business in "the several states"; they figured out ways around the rules.
true, they do it by having duplicate corporations. in the past you had state farm of arizona, state farm of new mexico, state farm of alabama, etc. now rather than having 50 corporate offices, there is one corporate office, and few regional offices, and lower costs for running the auto insurance portion of the company. that means that rates can be made lower.

the same thing would in fact happen with health insurance as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2012, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
true, they do it by having duplicate corporations. in the past you had state farm of arizona, state farm of new mexico, state farm of alabama, etc. now rather than having 50 corporate offices, there is one corporate office, and few regional offices, and lower costs for running the auto insurance portion of the company. that means that rates can be made lower.

the same thing would in fact happen with health insurance as well.
In fact, it does happen with health insurance, e.g. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of (insert name of sate). Many times now when I call an insurance company e.g. Aetna, Cigna, etc, I'm talking to someone out of state.I doubt one corporate office would lower costs significantly. I'm not sure why the RW is so hep on this idea, frankly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaiser_Permanente

Note the Kaiser organization operates in 9 states.

Last edited by Katarina Witt; 02-29-2012 at 02:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2012, 02:48 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,953,588 times
Reputation: 2938
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMe View Post
And Medicare is bankrupting us.

So you admit the Medicare reform bill Bush signed in 2003 has been a failure?


Bush signs landmark Medicare bill into law - CNN



The Bush Medicare bill did nothing to bring the insane costs of prescription drugs under control, prohibits reimportation of much cheaper drugs from Canada, etc. It was a wholesale giveaway to the drug companies. This is what is bankrupting the program. Most of the Medicare funds are squandered to pay for ridiculously overpriced drugs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2012, 03:25 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
In fact, it does happen with health insurance, e.g. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of (insert name of sate). Many times now when I call an insurance company e.g. Aetna, Cigna, etc, I'm talking to someone out of state.I doubt one corporate office would lower costs significantly. I'm not sure why the RW is so hep on this idea, frankly.

Kaiser Permanente - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note the Kaiser organization operates in 9 states.
you are calling a regional call center. not uncommon with many companies. be fortunate that your health insurance company didnt put their call center in india. that doesnt mean that blue cross/blue shield has one corporate offie though, they have several, one for each state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2012, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
you are calling a regional call center. not uncommon with many companies. be fortunate that your health insurance company didnt put their call center in india. that doesnt mean that blue cross/blue shield has one corporate offie though, they have several, one for each state.
If they had one corporate office in the US, they'd have all these sub-offices with their own administrators, staff, etc. It wouldn't save a dime, IMO.

I'm talking about the calls I have to make at work. For all I know, I might be calling India. Wherever I call, I frequently get people who don't speak English as a first language, which makes it difficult when talking about health care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 09:44 AM
 
4,412 posts, read 3,959,936 times
Reputation: 2326
The best thing that could ever happen to boost small businesses and entrepreneurship in the United States would would be to untether health insurance from employment. Not having to worry about health insurance would create opportunities for start-ups on a scale never seen in this country. And that's sadly why it's likely to never happen.

That's why pro-business conservatives should be all over either single payer, or some new model based upon the German, French or Swiss systems. But that would be "European," and "Socialist," and the reason why we can't have nice things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by cisco kid View Post
this is a false statement. under single-payer, the government does NOT run the healthcare system. healthcare is run by and provided by the private sector. the govt pays for your treatment, it doesn't provide it. hence the term single-payer.

like medicare in the US. medicare is a form of single-payer.
NOPE MEDICARE IS NOT SINGLEPAYER

if it was the INDIVIDUAL would not be required to purchase a supplemental insurace

single payer would be fine...if liberals could ever answer one question..........................HOW WOULD YOU PAY FOR IT

single payer would cost at best 2.5 trillion a year, to as much as 6 trillion a year......that would be 25,000 to 65,000 dollars PER TAX PAYER...every year
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Midwest
504 posts, read 1,270,937 times
Reputation: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
Still, a lot of conservatives believe pretty strongly in health care through bankruptcy as a means to assure them that the government stays the hell away from paying for some one else's medical care.
"Paying for someone else's medical care" is exactly what the USFG does, right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2012, 07:55 AM
 
1,733 posts, read 1,822,710 times
Reputation: 1135
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
NOPE MEDICARE IS NOT SINGLEPAYER

if it was the INDIVIDUAL would not be required to purchase a supplemental insurace

single payer would be fine...if liberals could ever answer one question..........................HOW WOULD YOU PAY FOR IT

single payer would cost at best 2.5 trillion a year, to as much as 6 trillion a year......that would be 25,000 to 65,000 dollars PER TAX PAYER...every year
You make that post every time Here is one way to pay for it:

Take all the money spent on health care today, and use half of it.

You could take the tax money the government spends on health care today, and have a couple of hundred billion left over. Single payer would cost about 1,3 trillion. Or you could run a German type system and use all the money spent on private insurance today, and have a few hundred billion left over.

Remember, the most expensive people to cover are the over-65s. Mediacre pays for them. Then there are the second most expensive, people who are too ill to work. Also on government health care through medicaid. Next, veterans with war wounds. Enjoying government health care courtesy of VA. And last all the people healthy enbough to work. Who pays for everyone else.

The cheapest group to insure, and the only ones who are left. And are paying for everyone else.

Today, America pays 2. 5 trillion dollars per year for health care. Single payer runs at half that. Without the economics of scale that America enjoys. That is two military budgets worth of money wasted each year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top