Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-19-2012, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,219 posts, read 22,393,554 times
Reputation: 23859

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunnysee View Post
They are more than "my idea" but they are, in reality a wonderful family.
Remember....soon as McCain introduced Palin as the VP candidate, over 30 individual Private Eyes swooped into Wasilla like a swarm of flies, looking, anticipating finding what they were confident existed! HA!

Every dang one of 'em left her state empty-handed. Palin was then proven to be as squeaky clean as she "acts."

It ain't an act, but then people change, right? They failed to even find 30 yr. old dirt on her. Can't say that for oh, let's say OBAMA or BIDEN, had those private eyes instead bothered to dig up dirt on THOSE two.
...and how does any of that say 'wonderful' to you? Palin is not a criminal, but that says nothing about her bad mothering. Most bad mothers are not criminals- just rotten Moms.
I would call hauling a pregnant teenager and her reluctant boyfriend out in the spotlight, at a time when Bristol was surely sensitive to her condition and her failing romance, nothing but bad mothering.

I know as the father of a daughter, I would never subject my girl to that kind of scrutiny, no matter how badly I wanted to be Someone Important. To do so is both stupid and very cruel to the child.

Now a woman can't help being stupid, but they don't have to be cruel needlessly to their kids. Stupidity is no excuse for that kind of behavior.

And a husband and the father of their kids can forbid such a display. Todd's a bully, but he went along with that mess we all saw on TV. If that's your notion of a wonderful family, so be it.

It certainly is not mine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2012, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,854,411 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Oh please...surely you don't believe that BS, do you? Look for the man behind the curtain. Of course the campaign, through the vile Left, was behind the attacks.
I most certainly do believe it. Obama nor Michelle has said ONE WORD about Bristol Palin and her antics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,375,811 times
Reputation: 7990
I'm kind of surprised that Team Obama is this dumb. Little more than a week after self-righteously calling out Limbaugh over the word '****,' palling around with David Letterman, who gratutiously referred to Palin as 'slutty.' They surely know how this makes them look. Image management is the one thing at which Team Obama excels. Could this mean that Obama has given up on re-election???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 08:01 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,975,014 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
I'm kind of surprised that Team Obama is this dumb. Little more than a week after self-righteously calling out Limbaugh over the word '****,' palling around with David Letterman, who gratutiously referred to Palin as 'slutty.' They surely know how this makes them look. Image management is the one thing at which Team Obama excels. Could this mean that Obama has given up on re-election???
Well, they need that $1 million from Maher and if he were to call Palin and console her, like he did fluke, that would not sit well with his frothing left-wing base.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...ect-your-call/

Quote:
Less than a month after the president called a law student insulted by Rush Limbaugh to offer his personal support, Bristol Palin says she is still waiting for Obama to call her about derogatory remarks liberal comedian Bill Maher has made about her and her family.

Asked about Maher’s comments and whether the president should ask his PAC to return his donation, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters. “We are not, and cannot be, the arbitrator of every statement that everybody makes in the policy and political arena.”
No? Why'd you call fluke? Obviously a political STUNT, trying to continue this narrative he's all for women. Just leftist hags are good enough for him to call?

http://www.businessinsider.com/brist...ma-2012-3?op=1

Quote:
At the end of her post, she calls on Obama to take a stand against "the denigration of all women" because he's the President "of all Americans, not just the liberals."
I'm sorry dear, but he doesn't agree with you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,091,534 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Well, they need that $1 million from Maher and if he were to call Palin and console her, like he did fluke, that would not sit well with his frothing left-wing base.
Why should he call her now for something that happened three years ago, and that he loudly condemned then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 03:56 AM
 
764 posts, read 597,667 times
Reputation: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
This is beautiful...but we all know ONLY those women that support and agree with obama/the dems/Left would EVER get a call.

Mr. President, When Should I Expect Your Call? | Bristol Palin



Excellent call out the hypocrisy and double standard.
Well, until Obamas daughters are adults, like Bristol was and is, the two scenarios aren't comparable. Or are you guys still pushing that bulls*** about Letterman talking about Palins underage daughter, and not Bristol herself?

Quote:
These denials of contraceptive coverage impact real people. In the worst cases, women who need this medication for other medical reasons suffer very dire consequences. A friend of mine, for example, has polycystic ovarian syndrome, and she has to take prescription birth control to stop cysts from growing on her ovaries. Her prescription is technically covered by Georgetown's insurance, because it's not intended to prevent pregnancy. Unfortunately, under many religious institutions' insurance plans, it wouldn't be. There would be no exception for other medical needs. And under Senator Blunt's amendment, Senator Rubio's bill or Representative Fortenberry's bill, there's no requirement that such an exception be made for these medical needs.

When this exception does exist, these exceptions don't accomplish their well-intended goals, because when you let university administrators or other employers, rather than women and their doctors, dictate whose medical needs are legitimate and whose are not, a woman's health takes a backseat to a bureaucracy focused on policing her body. In 65 percent of the cases at our school, our female students were interrogated by insurance representatives and university medical staff about why they needed prescriptions and whether they were lying about their symptoms. For my friend, and 20 percent of the women in her situation, she never got the insurance company to cover her prescription. Despite verification of her illness from her doctor, her claim was denied repeatedly on the assumption that she really wanted birth control to prevent pregnancy. She's gay -- so clearly, polycystic ovarian syndrome was a much more urgent concern than accidental pregnancy for her.

After months of paying over $100 out of pocket, she just couldn't afford her medication anymore, and she had to stop taking it. I learned about all of this when I walked out of a test and got a message from her that, in the middle of the night in her final-exam period, she'd been in the emergency room. She'd been there all night in just terrible, excruciating pain. She wrote to me: "It was so painful I woke up thinking I'd been shot." Without her taking the birth control, a massive cyst the size of a tennis ball had grown on her ovary. She had to have surgery to remove her entire ovary as a result. On the morning I was originally scheduled to give this testimony, she was sitting in a doctor's office trying to cope with the consequences of this medical catastrophe.

Since last year's surgery, she's been experiencing night sweats and awaking and other symptoms of early menopause as a result of the removal of her ovary. She's 32 years old. As she put it: If my body indeed does enter early menopause, no fertility specialist in the world will be able to help me have my own children. I will have no choice at giving my mother her desperately desired grandbabies, simply because the insurance policy -- that I paid for, totally unsubsidized by my school -- wouldn't cover my prescription for birth control when I needed it. Now, in addition to potentially facing the health complications that come with having menopause at such an early age -- increased risk of cancer, heart disease, osteoporosis -- she may never be able to conceive a child.

Some may say that my friend's tragic story is rare. It's not. I wish it were. One woman told us doctors believe she has endometriosis, but that can't be proven without surgery. So the insurance has not been willing to cover her medication, the contraception she needs to treat her endometriosis. Recently, another woman told me that she also has polycystic ovarian syndrome, and she's struggling to pay for her medication and is terrified not to have access to it. Due to the barriers erected by Georgetown's policy, she hasn't been reimbursed for her medication since last August. I sincerely pray that we don't have to wait until she loses an ovary or is diagnosed with cancer before her needs and the needs of all of these women are taken seriously, because this is the message that not requiring coverage of contraception sends: A woman's reproductive health care isn't a necessity, isn't a priority.

One woman told us that she knew birth control wasn't covered on the insurance, and she assumed that that's how Georgetown's insurance handled all of women's reproductive and sexual health care. So when she was raped, she didn't go to the doctor, even to be examined or tested for sexually transmitted infections, because she thought insurance wasn't going to cover something like that, something that was related to a woman's reproductive health.
That's what she said. Quit going to FOX to be told your view on matter, and read it.

Sandra Fluke went to the Democratic Congressional Panel, and presented a well thought out case for a cause she believed in, that has been in the public eye for a long time. She gave legitimate medical reasons for why some women need contraceptives, and brought up the logical scenario that if coverage can be denied, even under said medical reasons, there WILL be a fight to not provide. Full coverage eliminates that possibility. This woman said she didn't want the well being of woman across the country, to hang the balance of some greedy bureaucracy...

...and because of that, because Rush Limbaugh didn't like what she had to say, he slandered her name, and misled millions. All legitimate talk has gone straight out the window. This woman who went to her elected officials for a legitimate reason, and was insulted by some fat over indulged fool, which in turn, led to his delusional audience insulting her over something she never said, or wanted. It's wrong, and I'm glad one of our elected officials would consul her and let her know he didn't think this is the way things should be handled, opportunism or not.

There's nothing to compare it to with Maher. That's a bunch of manufactured outrage. The guys been a comedian for 33 years. He has a weekly show pretty much 50/50 in terms of comedy and political commentary. A throwaway joke in a monologue, or bit, can't be compared to the legitimate damage people like Rush Limbaugh can, and are causing idealogy wise in this country. Palin/Bachmann say and do all the stupid s*** they get insulted for. Fluke didn't...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 04:00 AM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,527,685 times
Reputation: 7472
Obama is Sandra Fluke's sugar daddy. Bristol Palin isn't expecting him to give her anything plus she isn't asking for anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 05:33 AM
 
3,345 posts, read 3,077,483 times
Reputation: 1725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back to NE View Post
Bristol honey, why would Pres Obama call you? You don't stand for anything except for something you lost all credibility on: getting knocked up out of wedlock. Ms. Fluke was representing the 99% of women who know contraceptives are a routine part of maintaining their health.

So quit acting like your mom, it's not a good look anymore.
Miss "Fluke " IS a prostitute and ****.... Rush is correct....

She was taken on a vacation by some guy and had sex with him as a result of this

Sex for monetary gain (money, shopping, vacation) = prostitute. Nothing wrong with that except... uhhhh... lets call it as it is bristol, while not a beacon of virtue, standds for more than Fluke does any day

Time for you to get out a dictionary there honey

By the way, the selective outrage by the dems is really indicative of mental illness

Last edited by CaseyB; 03-20-2012 at 06:23 AM.. Reason: language
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 06:43 AM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,851,624 times
Reputation: 2059
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Playing the victim like Fluke did? Is that what you mean?
BIG difference between "playing a victim" and "being a victim" as Sandra Fluke was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 06:48 AM
 
Location: USA - midwest
5,944 posts, read 5,587,648 times
Reputation: 2606
Lightbulb Bristol Palin to obama: When Should I Expect Your Call?

It's now cross-generational. So, the Palin paranoia is apparently carried on the maternal X chromosome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top