Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-20-2012, 12:14 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,131,520 times
Reputation: 9409

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
The debt is due to increased spending in dealing with the recession(ie. extended UE payments, lost tax revenue from lost jobs and Corp profit decreases, increasing Medicare and SS demands, Wars ....) Yes, the economy has slowed resulting in less ability to handling expenditures. As the economy picks back up as it is, the defits will lower. Eventually we will get back to the economy growing faster than expenditures. What we do with that surplus, will be a question that, hopefully, we answer better than we have since Clinton. When Obama get there, I suspect he will act more like Clinton than Bush. With a few more Dem Presidents coming up, we have a good period to look forward to. Maybe in a decade or two, we will be able to have another Repub.
Bob, come on. There will be no surplus in the next 5 years. Why would you even assert something so absurd?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-20-2012, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,954,445 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post


Federal spending has increased in nearly all catagories since 1990. In inflation adjusted dollars, we spend right around $7000 per person throughout the entire decade of the 90s. That increased to about $9000 per person throughout Ws terms, and increase of ~28% in spending, or 3.5% per year. Under Obama that has gone to ~$10,500, an increase of ~17% in 3 years, or 5.6% per year. Neither are sustainable.

Per the chart above, federal spending has increased in virtually all areas. At least projections show defense spending declining, by upwards of 20% by 2016. Unfortunately, increases in other areas exceed those cuts. Again...not sustainable, and who knows if those cuts will actually happen.
I don't see how you arrived at "Under Obama that has gone to ~$10,500, an increase of ~17% in 3 years, or 5.6% per year." Obama was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009. Accord to the source we have been using, the spending rate has not increased at all. Please remember that on Jan. 7, 2009, two-weeks before Obama took office, the CBO was already projecting (see page 9) a 2009 deficit of $1.2 trillion. Obama couldn't possibly be accountable for a deficit prior to him assuming office.

Quote:
CBO projects that the deficit this year will total $1.2 trillion, or 8.3 percent of GDP. Enactment of an economic stimulus package would add to that deficit. In CBO’s baseline, the deficit for 2010 falls to 4.9 percent of GDP, still high by historical standards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top