Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-31-2012, 05:36 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

We live in a highly chemical environment now and sure, I can believe that over the years it has effected us and is showing up in our offspring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-31-2012, 05:41 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,384,306 times
Reputation: 73937
My bet is HFCS.

I think everything that has happened in the last 20 years (increase in DM, cancer, obesity, etc) goes back to the food. There is something wrong with the food.

They have shown that genetic information can be switched on and off by things we ingest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 05:42 AM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,483 posts, read 11,287,685 times
Reputation: 9002
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb View Post
Why are you so quick to dismiss the better diagnosis hypothesis? In 1960, guess how many people were diagnosed as ADHD? Zero. Does that mean that before the very recent past people didn't have trouble concentrating? Of course not... something may be causing autism, or it may just be that we're now giving a medical label to the extremely socially awkward.
Exactly! In the past, kids with Asperger's Syndrome (a form of autism) were simply the obnoxious kid in the room with delusions of superiority who were prone to being bullied. Now they are being diagnosed as autistic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 06:01 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,026,245 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
The MSM is reporting a spike in autism of 78 percent, and the odds of having an autistic child is now 1 in 88.

CDC: U.S. kids with autism up 78% in past decade - CNN.com

Move along folks, nothing to see here...

They are still trying to push that "better diagnosis" route, but I think that most people believe by now that something is causing autism, and it's something that some powerful interest doesn't want let out of the bag. My three top culprits are:

Vaccines
Food
Pollution

The FDA keeps denying any link between any of those things and autism, even though vaccines have a very clear correlations with autism. So when is the public going to put pressure on the FDA to man up and actually investigate the cause of autism instead of explaining it away? My guess is the same time the worthless FDA bans the policy of rotating the Pharma CEOs through the head FDA positions. In other words, never.
My culprit guesses with regard to the parents are:

1. Seafood (anything eaten that comes out of the water)
2. The older age of the mother
3. Marijuana use by one or both parents sometime in their life
4. Aspartame and/or other sugar substitutes people don't even know is in their beverages and food
5. Some vitamin given to pregnant women that wasn't given to them 40 years ago
6. Some common home chemical (like dishwashing detergent)
7. flu shots
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 06:58 AM
 
12,906 posts, read 15,664,669 times
Reputation: 9394
I read a similar article a few days ago and the study suggests that "better diagnosis" is no longer the issue. They have accounted for that in their results. It really is sort of scary. I have read all the vaccine stuff and while that seems obvious in some cases, mainly because the noticeable onset often coincides with a vaccine (kids are ALWAYS getting them), there are kids who are not vax'ed that are getting it.

I read something last year that stated they were finding a correlation between mothers who had taken SSRIs and autism rates but I never saw anything more on that. That's piqued my interest because so many women are prescribed these meds unneccesarily and it often starts in their teen years. Doctors are very irresponsible, IMO, with those meds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 07:06 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA View Post
I read a similar article a few days ago and the study suggests that "better diagnosis" is no longer the issue. They have accounted for that in their results. It really is sort of scary. I have read all the vaccine stuff and while that seems obvious in some cases, mainly because the noticeable onset often coincides with a vaccine (kids are ALWAYS getting them), there are kids who are not vax'ed that are getting it.

I read something last year that stated they were finding a correlation between mothers who had taken SSRIs and autism rates but I never saw anything more on that. That's piqued my interest because so many women are prescribed these meds unneccesarily and it often starts in their teen years. Doctors are very irresponsible, IMO, with those meds.
I agree that it is very scary especially when the easy out is "better diagnosis" and then it's dismissed and accepted by the masses.

It's even scarier that the number of students in special education in the schools has risen dramatically in the past several years. They attribute that increase to "better identification" of special ed students.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 07:23 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,085 posts, read 12,058,406 times
Reputation: 4125
No, the problem here is we have a bunch of people making wild guess without any proven facts...then running with them like it's true.

People who are concerned and frightened willing to gasp at anything so they have feel like they have some control.

Taking bets, half remembered news articles, unsubstantiated claims, and wild guesses are not proof or science.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Camberville
15,866 posts, read 21,449,188 times
Reputation: 28216
I think the better diagnosis idea holds a lot of weight.

Completely anecdotally - my mom worked as a teacher in a school for kids with behavioral disorders (which unfortunately then meant a lot of foster kids, kids who were abused, etc etc who needed therapy and real help, not an alternative school). They would only call a child autistic if he or she was a savant - the idea of the spectrum was not adopted yet. Looking back, she says that many of the kids were on the spectrum but just never diagnosed as such. That's why you get so many adults who are just now realizing that they have Aspergers - they were functional so their quirks were treated as controllable problems (which is why they got bullied, treated differently by teachers, etc).

Beyond that, I can't say that I understand the science behind why so many kids are getting autism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,214,925 times
Reputation: 9895
Autistic children were only diagnosed in the most severe cases in the past, now we are seeing children who may have a slight level of autism. Many of these children would have never been diagnosed in the past.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
6,476 posts, read 7,325,718 times
Reputation: 7026
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
My culprit guesses with regard to the parents are:

1. Seafood (anything eaten that comes out of the water)
2. The older age of the mother
3. Marijuana use by one or both parents sometime in their life
4. Aspartame and/or other sugar substitutes people don't even know is in their beverages and food
5. Some vitamin given to pregnant women that wasn't given to them 40 years ago
6. Some common home chemical (like dishwashing detergent)
7. flu shots
global warming.
You forgot global warming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top