Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-19-2012, 12:06 AM
 
47 posts, read 93,742 times
Reputation: 23

Advertisements

There's a website called "royaldutchshellplc.com" which is clearly NOT the official website of Shell. It's a parody. But a lot of the information on it is negative. Isn't that considered cybersquatting?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2012, 12:27 AM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,543 posts, read 37,145,710 times
Reputation: 14001
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandyPuppy1977 View Post
There's a website called "royaldutchshellplc.com" which is clearly NOT the official website of Shell. It's a parody. But a lot of the information on it is negative. Isn't that considered cybersquatting?
That is your freedom of speech at work, hell even your news media have the right to lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 12:31 AM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,477,038 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandyPuppy1977 View Post
There's a website called "royaldutchshellplc.com" which is clearly NOT the official website of Shell. It's a parody. But a lot of the information on it is negative. Isn't that considered cybersquatting?
Not according to this:

Cybersquatting | LII / Legal Information Institute
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 12:41 AM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,543 posts, read 37,145,710 times
Reputation: 14001
royaldutchshellplc.com is a Royal Dutch Shell gripe site and blog operated by Alfred and John Donovan, who engaged in several marketing campaigns with Shell during the 1980s and early 1990s. The father and son duo believe Shell violated intellectual property agreements and filed several law suits against Shell prior to starting several websites critical of Shell, including royaldutchshellplc.com. The site has been oft quoted in news sources and is known for its activities as an Internet leak and forum for Shell whistleblowers. royaldutchshellplc.com - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think if it were illegal it would have been shut down long ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 02:01 PM
 
47 posts, read 93,742 times
Reputation: 23
Actually this is a British website, not American, so the US Constitution doesn't apply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 02:04 PM
 
Location: City of Angels
2,918 posts, read 5,609,332 times
Reputation: 2267
the fact that someone would want to make a law specifically to ban something like that is truly disturbing.

ban everything, huh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 02:08 PM
 
Location: USA
13,255 posts, read 12,129,807 times
Reputation: 4228
Quote:
Originally Posted by foadi View Post
the fact that someone would want to make a law specifically to ban something like that is truly disturbing.

ban everything, huh?
He's probably a Shell PR guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 02:30 PM
 
47 posts, read 93,742 times
Reputation: 23
I think shellsucks.com would make a more appropriate title. That is a name I can agree with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 02:32 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
This game has gone on since the internet started. It was a big money maker for a while registering names and selling em back to a company who wanted em or wanted to shut em down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 05:10 PM
 
47 posts, read 93,742 times
Reputation: 23
An Israeli (Jewish) businessman now living in North Carolina was sued by Nissan for using the domain nissan.com as the URL for his computer repair shop. He registered the name in 1994, and I suspect a pretty shady company let him have it. The guy argued that Nissan was known as Datsun when he moved to the USA and started his first business in 1976. I don't know why that matters because Datsun became Nissan in 1984, 10 years before he started his site.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top