Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
1 in 219 girls was molested by a lesbian. 1 out of 50 boys by a gay male. About 8 in 10 girls were molested by a man who was or had been in a heterosexual relationship with the child's mother or another relative. 3 out of 4 boys were abused by males in heterosexual relationships with female relatives.
2% of the boys in the study were molested by gay males.
98% of the boys in the study were molested by heterosexuals. Of that number, 75% were molested by heterosexual males KNOWN TO THE VICTIMS in an incestuous scenario.
0.05% of the girls in the study were molested by a lesbian.
99.5% of the girls in the study were molested by heterosexuals. Of that number, 80% were molested by heterosexual males KNOWN TO THE VICTIMS in an incestuous scenario.
That study is full of crap.
First it was "preformed" (i.e. propagandized by a known homosexual) on 276 girls and 76 boys of which many were dismissed. Besides it's almost impossible to tell if a boy was molested physically by a male or female and girls it's very easy to diagnose which skews all sorts of results.
Then it goes on to this gem:
Quote:
Using the data from our study, the 95% confidence limits, of the risk children would identify recognizably homosexual adults as the potential abuser, are from 0% to 3.1%.
Someone needs to dethrone this woman and strip her of her credentials for claiming that a child is going to be able to recognize who's a homo and who isn't.
I didn't even open the link. Disgusting is too mild a word for this. The poor kid, can you imagine how much psychotherapy he's going to need for the rest of his life? Blech.
Unfortunately, I doubt that psychotherapy will fix him. This is the stuff that keeps the cycle of child molestation in tact. The womb (aka mother) should be prosecuted and sentenced to life in prison.
Last edited by PurpleRain_1; 05-27-2012 at 11:06 AM..
First it was "preformed" (i.e. propagandized by a known homosexual) on 276 girls and 76 boys of which many were dismissed. Besides it's almost impossible to tell if a boy was molested physically by a male or female and girls it's very easy to diagnose which skews all sorts of results.
Then it goes on to this gem:
Someone needs to dethrone this woman and strip her of her credentials for claiming that a child is going to be able to recognize who's a homo and who isn't.
Really? The American Academy of Pediatricians didn't seem to think so. It was published in the Journal of Pediatrics.
Calling something 'full of crap' just because you don't understand it (your post shows you don't) or don't like the results, doesn't mean it isn't sound research.
No that is incest. I should have said two non related consenting adults. Thank you for catching that.
And why is homosexuality between two consenting adults acceptable and incest not?
I am trying to understand why your conditions as to what is morally acceptable is valid over that of another when it concerns such.
Why is incest bad between two consenting adults? Is it the chance of genetic problems? From what I have read on the issue, the chances are quite small and in that case, it is merely if they do not protect themselves. Even then, with the acceptance of abortions, does it really matter? I mean, they can simply abort the fetus if such were to occur just to be safe right?
I am not condoning the practice if you were hoping to come at it from that angle, but I would like to see how you justify one over the other?
Someone needs to dethrone this woman and strip her of her credentials for claiming that a child is going to be able to recognize who's a homo and who isn't.
Common problem these days in many studies. I think anyone who is going into the field of research using statistics should have a minimum of a masters in mathematics. Too many goofballs go into "research" fields with only a very limited knowledge in the subject to which they rely the most on to establish their position.
And why is homosexuality between two consenting adults acceptable and incest not?
I am trying to understand why your conditions as to what is morally acceptable is valid over that of another when it concerns such.
Why is incest bad between two consenting adults? Is it the chance of genetic problems? From what I have read on the issue, the chances are quite small and in that case, it is merely if they do not protect themselves. Even then, with the acceptance of abortions, does it really matter? I mean, they can simply abort the fetus if such were to occur just to be safe right?
I am not condoning the practice if you were hoping to come at it from that angle, but I would like to see how you justify one over the other?
In incest cases there is almost always a position of power being used to coerce one party into involvement.
In homosexual couples there is an equal balance of power.
And considering that research shows that a child is FAR more likely to be sexually molested by a heterosexual family member than a gay person.
Gays just came out of the closet, give it a little more time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mother 'made sex tape with her son, 16, and sent him naked photos of herself'
