Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
After Wisconsin, and the cities of San Jose and San Diego, Iowa is next. I dislike Branstad, but support any measure by anyone to eviscerate the public unions. Enough taking taxpayers for a ride.
After Wisconsin, and the cities of San Jose and San Diego, Iowa is next. I dislike Branstad, but support any measure by anyone to eviscerate the public unions. Enough taking taxpayers for a ride.
After Wisconsin, and the cities of San Jose and San Diego, Iowa is next. I dislike Branstad, but support any measure by anyone to eviscerate the public unions. Enough taking taxpayers for a ride.
good for Iowa, it is time for the taxpayers to divest themselves of public unions.
After Wisconsin, and the cities of San Jose and San Diego, Iowa is next. I dislike Branstad, but support any measure by anyone to eviscerate the public unions. Enough taking taxpayers for a ride.
Of course not. He is an IMPORTANT PERSON and all the rest of the public employees are just overpaid peons that should be working for handouts like the private sector.
I think its fair . Some skin in the game is always important. Our city workers pay more than 20% and the offical who they work for unless not covered at all ;pay the same amount. As far as drug testig that is random unless in a accident ;then mandatory. Can't want to be sue happy and not have consequaecnce to defend;really.
After Wisconsin, and the cities of San Jose and San Diego, Iowa is next. I dislike Branstad, but support any measure by anyone to eviscerate the public unions. Enough taking taxpayers for a ride.
Branstad already pissed off the unions by opening up govt projects for bid to non union folks via exec order. I can hear the squealing from my home now. lol
After Wisconsin, and the cities of San Jose and San Diego, Iowa is next. I dislike Branstad, but support any measure by anyone to eviscerate the public unions. Enough taking taxpayers for a ride.
House and Senate Republicans in February proposed that state employees pay $2,400 a year in premiums, but did not include lawmakers in that bill.
So, you know, "do as I say and not as I do" and all that....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
