Woman Has to Cover Breasts, Even Though She Doesn't Have Them after Double Mastectomy, to Swim in Pool (state, laws)

[Greg_IA]

Originally Posted by kshe95girl

And Puritanical conservatives such as yourself, you see phantom boobs where there are none.
Literally.

I am a conservative, but far from a Puritan.

It is a long way from demonstrating common decency to being a Puritan.

[helenejen]

Originally Posted by Greg_IA

She is still a woman. It is a family place.

So at a family place, women must subject themselves to severe pain for appearance sake, even when there would not be any appearance of breasts should a woman not wear a bikini top?

Originally Posted by kshe95girl

Dont know if I would exactly call that line of thinking "logic".

I know. It implies thinking, which obviously has no place is some people's world. But I dare to hope, what can I say.

[kshe95girl]

Originally Posted by Greg_IA

I am a conservative, but far from a Puritan.

It is a long way from demonstrating common decency to being a Puritan.

You do realize that you are arguing in favor of making a woman without breasts or nipples, due to a double mastectomy, wear a top, merely "because shes a woman"?

[helenejen]

Originally Posted by Greg_IA

I am a conservative, but far from a Puritan.

It is a long way from demonstrating common decency to being a Puritan.

Originally Posted by kshe95girl

You do realize that you are arguing in favor of making a woman without breasts or nipples, due to a double mastectomy, wear a top, merely "because shes a woman"?

And don't forget that the top will induce pain. After all, what kind of family would it be without a woman in unnecessary pain?

[kshe95girl]

Originally Posted by helenejen

So at a family place, women must subject themselves to severe pain for appearance sake, even when there would not be any appearance of breasts should a woman not wear a bikini top?



I know. It implies thinking, which obviously has no place is some people's world. But I dare to hope, what can I say.

Astounding, isnt it?

[43north87west]

Men, no breasts, have nipples, no top required.
Woman, breasts removed, nipples removed, must wear top because "if" she had breasts they "would" be exposed if she went topless.

Nope, still doesn't make sense.

[kshe95girl]

Originally Posted by 43north87west

Men, no breasts, have nipples, no top required.
Woman, breasts removed, nipples removed, must wear top because "if" she had breasts they "would" be exposed if she went topless.

Nope, still doesn't make sense.

Folks, we have a winner!

[Fox Terrier]

Originally Posted by helenejen

Seriously?! Mastectomy scars where this woman's breasts use to be are going to cause you to become aroused in public?

And haven't you heard, according to eric, men "run around topless" too.

And some of those men have bigger boobs than I do!

[sinsativ]

I don't know, and not to make light of breast cancer, but, to look at it from reality's standpoint.
Moderator cut: image removed

[helenejen]

Originally Posted by sinsativ

I don't know, and not to make light of breast cancer, but, to look at it from reality's standpoint.

Reason so simple that it is easily conveyed in a cartoon, and yet some people still don't get it.