Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Right and rules aren't made at in public areas for ONE person. Why can't you understand that? Society has rules to abide by whether you agree with them or not. If you don't blow up a little turtle pool in the back yard and swim away without your shirt on if you so desire.
I love swimming naked, but no I don't do so in public. And this has nothing to do with flaunting society's rules as much as you want to make it appear so. Women cover their breasts because they have breasts. It makes zero sense for a woman who literally has no breasts to have to cover what isn't there. Rules for rules sake may make some people feel secure, but it's nothing more than the cocoon of stupidity.
As I said, learn some compassion......actually reading the OPs link might do wonders for your (sic) argument here.
I never would have put up the link to the article if I had known that there were going to be some sickos sexualizing this complete stranger of a woman because she isn't wearing a shirt to cover-up her non-existent breasts.
I love swimming naked, but no I don't do so in public. And this has nothing to do with flaunting society's rules as much as you want to make it appear so. Women cover their breasts because they have breasts. It makes zero sense for a woman who literally has no breasts to have to cover what isn't there. Rules for rules sake may make some people feel secure, but it's nothing more than the cocoon of stupidity.
Well if you had a mastectomy I would ask you out with my fetish and all. lol
Why should she have to? There is no reason to make her suffer nerve pain in this situation. In fact, for those of you who don't know from experience, swimming without clothes is remarkably superior to swimming with clothes on. Once you've experienced it, the discomfort of clothing while swimming is obvious. Too bad we all can't afford private back-yard swimming pools.
This situation is simply a modern example of our repressive beginnings, where some societies think a woman must be covered up head-to-toe in public, lest she tempt some man to think about sex and get uncomfortable or out-of-control.
I never would have put up the link to the article if I had known that there were going to be some sickos sexualizing this complete stranger of a woman because she isn't wearing a shirt to cover-up her non-existent breasts.
For some strange, bizarre reason, some folks seem to get their jollies by doing things like this.
We all know who they are on this forum.
If by neo-conservative we both mean that the government sets and enforces a "moral" ideal, then yes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
