Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The only one offended would be the likes of Al Sharpton, because the teet and baby are white. Maybe big Al can pose for the next ad with a baby suckling his big flabby booby. That should calm things down.
The only one offended would be the likes of Al Sharpton, because the teet and baby are white. Maybe big Al can pose for the next ad with a baby suckling his big flabby booby. That should calm things down.
I read that the image was never to be used in any public advertising campaign in the USA.
And was not meant for the public to see.
Quote:
Food giant Kraft, owner of Nabisco (the firm which produces Oreos), has swiftly moved into damage limitation mode, with a representative assuring ABC News that Kraft had no part in creating the advert.
The spokesperson also denied that the ad had run in South Korea or any other country. The ad has been attributed to Cheil Worldwide, an independent advertising agency.
I'm not seeing the issue here. Is it the itty bit of nipple protruding from the infant's mouth? The breast itself? The breastfeeding aspect?
Really, this is the food ad people are freaking out about? But Kate Upton practically rubbing her cleavage with a messy burger is okay? Boobs on a hot chick=hot, but boobs in a baby's mouth=gross??
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.