Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-16-2012, 02:01 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,948,683 times
Reputation: 3159

Advertisements

Up until WWI, the primary source of revenue for the federal govt. was tariffs (customs) placed on good produced outside of the country.

In the beginning, the founding fathers realized that to grow the country they had to protect local business. We had all of the resources here and therefore had a competitive advantage. It worked. Now, the emerging economies of India and CHina are doing the same thing and they are becoming the superpowers.

If we are going to keep our global position and bolster our economy, it may be necessary to go back to Tariffs again to protect our business and provide jobs for our citizens. There should be tariffs placed on all goods produced outside of the U.S. that would bring the cost higher than American made products.

The counter argument is that it would make products more expensive. That is absolutely true on average. However, if you don't have a job and no money, what difference does it make if one product costs a dollar more than another when you can't afford to buy either because you have no income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2012, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Flippin AR
5,513 posts, read 5,241,036 times
Reputation: 6243
Great idea. It would limit the federal government to a reasonable size, go back to the Founding Fathers' ideals, and free the working class from being tax slaves to a gigantic and over-controlling government.

Of course, with Washington Big Government now in full control of the nation and the states, and the working class losing a large chunk of their salaries to government before they even see the money, it would take another American Revolution. One that is LONG, LONG overdue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 02:52 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
got a giant jelly roll fat cat bureaucracy the purpose of the taxes are to feed them not provide services to us. massive subcontracting of all high 5 and 6 figure people would fix this. stop subcontracting just the little guy and kelly girl will work.
fire them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 03:03 PM
 
2,546 posts, read 2,464,673 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Up until WWI, the primary source of revenue for the federal govt. was tariffs (customs) placed on good produced outside of the country.

In the beginning, the founding fathers realized that to grow the country they had to protect local business. We had all of the resources here and therefore had a competitive advantage. It worked. Now, the emerging economies of India and CHina are doing the same thing and they are becoming the superpowers.

If we are going to keep our global position and bolster our economy, it may be necessary to go back to Tariffs again to protect our business and provide jobs for our citizens. There should be tariffs placed on all goods produced outside of the U.S. that would bring the cost higher than American made products.

The counter argument is that it would make products more expensive. That is absolutely true on average. However, if you don't have a job and no money, what difference does it make if one product costs a dollar more than another when you can't afford to buy either because you have no income.
Let's say 500,000 cars were imported in to the US in a year. Let's also say the tariff is 2.5%. Finally, let's assume the average value of the car is $20,000.

The duties collected would be $250,000,000.

But, the tariff also pushes up the price of domestic cars. Let's say 1 million domestic cars are sold each year. FYI, the YTD as of June total new light vehicle sales were 7,272,160, of which 3,821,728 were cars. Let's assume the average domestic car was also $20,000. The total increase in domestic car prices would be $2.5 billion.

So, duties on imported cars cost society an extra $2.75 billion.

Assume that saves 10,000 jobs in the US auto industry. Every one of those jobs cost consumers $275,000.

That is why tariffs are an awful idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 03:08 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,948,683 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHartphotog View Post
Great idea. It would limit the federal government to a reasonable size, go back to the Founding Fathers' ideals, and free the working class from being tax slaves to a gigantic and over-controlling government.

Of course, with Washington Big Government now in full control of the nation and the states, and the working class losing a large chunk of their salaries to government before they even see the money, it would take another American Revolution. One that is LONG, LONG overdue.
I honestly do not know how much revenue would be created...more or less, but it would satisfy one of the primary issues such as fostering an environment that would encourage companies to produce their products domestically instead of outsourcing them overseas, which would increase the number of jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 03:11 PM
 
Location: The Other California
4,254 posts, read 5,606,632 times
Reputation: 1552
Great idea, please sign me up. This would go a long way towards correcting both our tax policies and trade policies in one move.

If the states want to supplement with income taxes or what have you, that's their own business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 03:19 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,948,683 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkeconomist View Post
Let's say 500,000 cars were imported in to the US in a year. Let's also say the tariff is 2.5%. Finally, let's assume the average value of the car is $20,000.

The duties collected would be $250,000,000.

But, the tariff also pushes up the price of domestic cars. Let's say 1 million domestic cars are sold each year. FYI, the YTD as of June total new light vehicle sales were 7,272,160, of which 3,821,728 were cars. Let's assume the average domestic car was also $20,000. The total increase in domestic car prices would be $2.5 billion.

So, duties on imported cars cost society an extra $2.75 billion.

Assume that saves 10,000 jobs in the US auto industry. Every one of those jobs cost consumers $275,000.

That is why tariffs are an awful idea.
You are making up your own numbers and your own assumptions to support your conclusion that it is a bad idea.

Your first assumption is that the price of american made cars would increase more than they are now. You then assume that they would increase to as much as the foreign cars. You have no basis for the assumption.

You next assume that only 10K jobs are saved ( i will add or created) your final assumption or omission as the case may be is the fact that under your calculation we would have 250,000,000 in new revenue. That is revenue that consumers do not have to pay in taxes.

There is a valid argument against tariffs in that there are higher costs to the consumer. YOur argument is just made up of assumptions with no factual basis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 03:29 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 28 days ago)
 
27,647 posts, read 16,138,284 times
Reputation: 19074
What are people buying other than food and energy, perhaps a car part now and then, Soap and toilet paper? Why do people think they have to always buy stuff?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 03:34 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,048,770 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHartphotog View Post
Great idea. It would limit the federal government to a reasonable size, go back to the Founding Fathers' ideals, and free the working class from being tax slaves to a gigantic and over-controlling government.
Yeah, they can be REAL slaves, indentured, and convict labor instead. Whoopie!


Anyway, a trade war, what a lovely idea!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 03:49 PM
 
2,546 posts, read 2,464,673 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
You are making up your own numbers and your own assumptions to support your conclusion that it is a bad idea.

Your first assumption is that the price of american made cars would increase more than they are now. You then assume that they would increase to as much as the foreign cars. You have no basis for the assumption.

You next assume that only 10K jobs are saved ( i will add or created) your final assumption or omission as the case may be is the fact that under your calculation we would have 250,000,000 in new revenue. That is revenue that consumers do not have to pay in taxes.

There is a valid argument against tariffs in that there are higher costs to the consumer. Your argument is just made up of assumptions with no factual basis.
Last I looked, the tarriff on cars was 2.5%. The average new price of a car is $30,303. I already gave you the data for year-to-date new car sales.

And, referring to
Quote:
Your first assumption is that the price of american made cars would increase more than they are now. You then assume that they would increase to as much as the foreign cars. You have no basis for the assumption.
the price of the foreign competitor becomes the upper price for the market. So, no, domestically produced vehicles wouldn't necessarily cost as much, but capitalism suggests it should be priced nearly as much because producers have no reason not to.

And, yes, the tariff would generate $250 million in new revenue, but, also, cost consumers $2,500 million in available funds for other purchases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top