Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-30-2012, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, California
4,373 posts, read 3,230,467 times
Reputation: 1041

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Libsk View Post
Gays are the new government class.
Proof?

By that I mean valid forms of documentation where it says fill in the blank and gives a selection with homosexual and heterosexual being choices.

Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-30-2012, 04:19 PM
 
667 posts, read 516,524 times
Reputation: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0 View Post
No, the information here makes those "morals" wrong. I didn't say "You're wrong because I'm not happy with what you've said". I said you're wrong because the factual evidence suggests gays should be allowed to get married and adopt, and no consistent evidence has been provided to suggest otherwise.



If not factual evidence or hate, what motivates someone to want to discriminate against a group of people?



And what would give them reason to say I'm "morally bankrupt"? I've given my reasons.
All you have proven is that humans fail. I am sure I can site some very nasty things done by homosexuals. However, that speaks to the person and not the morals.

Maybe you can not dislike action without disliking the person but I can.

You have not proven that I am morally bankrupt.

I believe that God created us to be sexual in a male and female fashion. That design implies to me that God's intent is for a male and female sexual relationship. Anything outside that intent is immoral.

I have stated my position. We can disagree but we don't have to hate each other over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2012, 04:22 PM
 
410 posts, read 342,444 times
Reputation: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by adiosToreador View Post
Proof?

By that I mean valid forms of documentation where it says fill in the blank and gives a selection with homosexual and heterosexual being choices.

Thank you.
You're welcome. I never said there was a choice. I never believed it was a choice. I believe gays must be born gay, especially for men. No man who had a choice would choose to

Last edited by CaseyB; 07-30-2012 at 04:39 PM.. Reason: language
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2012, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,678,384 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by psulions2007 View Post
If you are going to own a business, you cannot discriminate.

It's pretty simple, actually.
According to who?

You?

That's a laugh!

Apparently, "We reserve the right to refuse service......" is way over your head.

Talk about simple..............
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2012, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, California
4,373 posts, read 3,230,467 times
Reputation: 1041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Libsk View Post
You're welcome
Where's the proof?

I asked you to provide proof that the new government class is homosexual.

That means providing documentation that has homosexual and heterosexual as options to fill in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2012, 04:26 PM
 
578 posts, read 1,093,220 times
Reputation: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenejen View Post
The point of a boycott is not to drive a business out of business. It's to get a business to cease whatever practice made some potential and current customers unhappy. A boycott is the fault of a business, not the consumer, as it is the business that put itself in the position that made a boycott possible.
Agreed. However; a business owner can certainly retract a comment or cease to contribute to certain organizations but my question is. Would you ever purchase from them again? So a boycott is ultimately to harm the business owner
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2012, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,187 posts, read 995,806 times
Reputation: 593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0 View Post
No, the information here makes those "morals" wrong. I didn't say "You're wrong because I'm not happy with what you've said". I said you're wrong because the factual evidence suggests gays should be allowed to get married and adopt, and no consistent evidence has been provided to suggest otherwise.



If not factual evidence or hate, what motivates someone to want to discriminate against a group of people?



And what would give them reason to say I'm "morally bankrupt"? I've given my reasons.
I'm not sure you gave "factual evidence" of anything either way. I think you gave some anecdotal evidence, biased by your own personal beliefs. Which is fine and good.. I even agree with them. However, that being said, who are you to say someone ELSE's beliefs are wrong and hate filled, just because you disagree with them? I mean, isn't this the same arguement about abortion? The christians think it's murder and horrible because it's a living being, and the right says the fetus doesn't matter. Well their morals are no better or worse than yours! They aren't any more filled with hate, then you are filled with murder.

I mean, fine, if you and others want to boycott every business that doesn't have the same moral convictions that you have... well more power to you... and a million moms, and the moral majority and whatever other tiny group that wants to boycott everything! I don't care about who does what with their money, as long as they aren't forcing ME to donate MY money where I don't want to... and once I give that business the money in exchange for whatever it's selling, it's no longer my money and they could do with it what they want. When I don't agree with them, I stop going there. No big deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2012, 04:37 PM
 
Location: TX
6,486 posts, read 6,392,191 times
Reputation: 2628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyndsong71 View Post
I'm not sure you gave "factual evidence" of anything either way.
If you had checked the links I directed you people to, you would've been sure I'll copy and paste it for ya...

Here is evidence that might suggest gays are just as good (better, actually) at making a marriage work than heterosexuals:

Study: Same Sex Couples Have Lower Divorce Rates Than The Straights
FiveThirtyEight: Politics Done Right: Divorce Rates Higher in States with Gay Marriage Bans

Here is evidence that being raised by gay parents is not harmful to children in any way:

APA Policy Statement: Sexual Orientation, Parents, & Children
Studies of same-sex parenting

And here is evidence that children of same-sex couples may even fare better, generally speaking:

A child's life in a "gay" household


Quote:
Originally Posted by TNEC_Dad View Post
All you have proven is that humans fail. I am sure I can site some very nasty things done by homosexuals. However, that speaks to the person and not the morals.
Wrong. The evidence suggests that homosexuals "fail" at about the same rate as (if not LESS OFTEN than) heterosexuals, in both marriage and parenting. Curiously, evidence to the contrary is lacking. Therefore, there is no justification for being pro-heterosexual marriage/parenting and anti-gay marriage/parenting.

And then you have people who want to blame it all on "God" or their religion. The fact is, the bible does not say gays shouldn't be allowed to marry or adopt. Only in regards to the verse where it says to kill them can a person claim the bible says that. And then the question becomes, "What about all the other people the bible says to kill?" Where is the opposition to people of different faiths getting married, for example? Nowhere. You know why? Because the want to keep gays from getting married or adopting is a personal prejudice against gays in particular. It cannot be defended using evidence, and it cannot be defended using religion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TNEC_Dad View Post
Maybe you can not dislike action without disliking the person but I can.
And what have I said or done that makes you think I dislike the people rather than their actions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TNEC_Dad View Post
I believe that God created us to be sexual in a male and female fashion. That design implies to me that God's intent is for a male and female sexual relationship. Anything outside that intent is immoral.
The bible calls many things wrong. And yet, all the people who do these other things have all the rights enjoyed by anyone following the bible... except gays. Don't you find that just a little transparent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TNEC_Dad View Post
I have stated my position. We can disagree but we don't have to hate each other over it.
And we don't have to discriminate against gays either.

Last edited by Vic 2.0; 07-30-2012 at 04:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2012, 04:38 PM
 
410 posts, read 342,444 times
Reputation: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by adiosToreador View Post
Proof?

By that I mean valid forms of documentation where it says fill in the blank and gives a selection with homosexual and heterosexual being choices.

Thank you.
http://m.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/20...under-New-Law/

Ask and you shall receive. Of course you'll deny because of the source and not fact, pen man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2012, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,047,421 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roaddog View Post
actually I've never seen anything about that on the news
Right.

The million mom boycotts have been actively ignored. THere wasn't a big issue over Ellen Degeneras being the spokeswoman of JC Penny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top