Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
FYI, The president of the US requires a bit more security than a president wanna be and his side-kick. If Obama did not limit the crowd size, you would be complaining about cost to tax payers and the closing of public access areas.
She will be worn out by then and not willing to fight the battle to beat an incumbent. I could see Obama making a 2nd run for 8 more years.
Term limits- total of two.
Obama is washed up politically. Unlike the 1800s, when candidates would run again, an incumbent president who has lost the election in modern times is finished. Witness Carter, Bush 1, Hoover, Taft, and now.................... Obama.
Obama has become politically toxic and I would imagine that the democratic party will be keeping thier distance from him for several years to come. He will be associated with economic failure and incompetence and no one will want to be reminded of his performance. He has become a political "Jonah".
FYI, The president of the US requires a bit more security than a president wanna be and his side-kick. If Obama did not limit the crowd size, you would be complaining about cost to tax payers and the closing of public access areas.
Most of his voters (Illegals) require ID to attend.
FYI, The president of the US requires a bit more security than a president wanna be and his side-kick. If Obama did not limit the crowd size, you would be complaining about cost to tax payers and the closing of public access areas.
Most of his voters (Illegals) require ID to attend.
FYI, The president of the US requires a bit more security than a president wanna be and his side-kick. If Obama did not limit the crowd size, you would be complaining about cost to tax payers and the closing of public access areas.
For an argument to be legit, the argument must be factual. If they were actually refusing entrance to people you might have a point. They aren't, people are simply not showing up.
FYI, The president of the US requires a bit more security than a president wanna be and his side-kick. If Obama did not limit the crowd size, you would be complaining about cost to tax payers and the closing of public access areas.
What does Obama have to fear?
After all, he is the chosen One.
How come Romney, Ryan and Ron Paul, do not need as much protection from the people?
Face it, people have lost interest in the proven False One.
I guess he is limiting crowd size by saying stupid things that ensure people dont like him..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
