Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-04-2012, 04:24 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,787,000 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stock56 View Post
Sandra Fluke, the woman who became the national face of birth control advocacy earlier this year,
Correction:

She did not become the national face of birth control advocacy.

She became the face of those who want government to force taxpayers to pay for birth control for her extreme numbers of sexual encounters.

When Limbaugh heard her demands, he replied that he would be willing to send her and each of her friends a quarter, if they would promise to clamp it between their knees during such times. Much cheaper, and more effective, than the birth control she was demanding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-04-2012, 04:32 PM
 
3,709 posts, read 4,629,378 times
Reputation: 1671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
I think this thread is a very telling account of what many on the right think of young professional women.
Her stance is not simply as a young professional woman. Her stance would make birth control more expensive for everyone.

If I demanded that insurance cover the cost of raincoats, and it happened, you think the cost of raincoats would not increase for everyone? She is yet another example that Dems do not understand economics in the least.

Lame attempt at making this out to be a sexist thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2012, 04:36 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,787,000 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by stock56 View Post
Sandra Fluke, the woman who became the national face of birth control advocacy earlier this year, has hit out at Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly for suggesting that condoms rather than balloons will rain down from the Democratic National Convention roof after her speech.

I hope for their sake Clinton hasn't already used them......yuck..what a mess that would be...


Fluke Takes on O'Reilly over Condom Quip
Let me get this straight (no pun intended).

This woman, who has no qualms about going on national TV and telling the world about she and her friends having so many unmarried sexual encounters that her birth control costs ran into many thousand of dollars....

...and then had the astonishing temerity to demand that others pay the bills for these birth control costs she keeps running up....

...is now "offended" that a man made a joke about dropping inflated condoms on her?

It was difficult to believe that she would make such demands with a straight face, then.

It's becoming impossible to believe her at all, now.

Who on Earth does she think will still buy her line of tripe?

Last edited by Little-Acorn; 09-04-2012 at 05:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2012, 04:50 PM
 
Location: NJ
23,563 posts, read 17,237,701 times
Reputation: 17603
SF was brought to light by Nancy Pelosi from San Fran. So SF is now in CA huh?

SF represnts the epitome of Obamaworld and socialist leanings which most of the country find revolting. A weakthy pre law college student, at the time, crying because she had to spend so much on birth control.

It almost seems a late night comedy skit. Except no one is laughing, it wasn't a joke put on by the dems to lighten the mood in these dark times.

The Dems were serious!!!!!!


JFK is rolling over as the words he spoke,,,," ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country" .....and he wasn't hinting at a socialist regime where 'what you can do for your country is give it all your money so Sandra and friends don't have to spend so much on birth control.

Sandra represents anything but contraception and birth control issues.

she represents the new path Obama has chosen to lead us screaming, where all sort of handouts will be the norm as they replace incentive, enthusiasm, creativity, industry and productivity. Sandra is the exact same woman who said she voted for obama because he would pay her bills, 'from his stash'...just from the other end of the spectrum. Two women who believe in the exact same philosophy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2012, 05:12 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,517,565 times
Reputation: 7472
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayneinspain View Post
Actually, she graduated c*m laude from Georgetown University this year and has taken the California bar exam. She is listed as an attorney, not a student.

I'm beginning to marvel at the selective and/or declining memory of some posters here. She advocated for insurance coverage of contraception, not a handout. The same insurance coverage afforded to horny old men for Viagra and Cialis.

Slam her all you will, but unless you are yourselves law school graduates, you've no place to call her a 'loser'.
Actually, she is pretty smart. If she does a good job at the DNC they will give her a place to work at the WH. I feel sorry for her though since they won't win and she will still be seen as the face of condoms and BC given out by a sugar daddy. She will be used and dumped like Monica was.

No one is having a problem with BC used for medical reasons. Pregnancy is not a dysfunction or a disease. Insurance should only cover those things. Viagra and Cialis are only given for a dysfunction of the body. Women also get those drugs. It's just marketed to men but women also use them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2012, 05:18 PM
 
1,635 posts, read 1,594,267 times
Reputation: 707
I think in Fluke Obama sees his mother. A slutty,30 plus year old perenniel student who wants government freebies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2012, 05:20 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,416 posts, read 60,608,674 times
Reputation: 61030
I knew a guy in college whose girlfriend complained that he used balloons for condoms. She liked me because I used condoms for..........well, what they were meant to be used for.

And I hate balloons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2012, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,288,764 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayneinspain View Post
Actually, she graduated c*m laude from Georgetown University this year and has taken the California bar exam. She is listed as an attorney, not a student.

I'm beginning to marvel at the selective and/or declining memory of some posters here. She advocated for insurance coverage of contraception, not a handout. The same insurance coverage afforded to horny old men for Viagra and Cialis.

Slam her all you will, but unless you are yourselves law school graduates, you've no place to call her a 'loser'.
Insurance companies are REQUIRED to cover Viagra?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2012, 05:25 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,517,565 times
Reputation: 7472
I read one office is making up limericks with Fluke in them. Easy to do, LOL I would think this was a SNL skit if I didn't see her on TV in front of Congress. Couldn't Obama's staff find anyone with another name to do this work?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2012, 05:31 PM
 
6,757 posts, read 8,287,348 times
Reputation: 10152
Y'all are hilarious. Despite all of the posts over the last few months explaining that you take the pill every day whether you're having sex or not, and that many of us women (myself included) take the pill for reasons that have nothing to do with birth control, you still insist on repeating the lies. This leads me to certain rather obvious conclusions regarding your collective intelligence, and about your intentions.

Get a new shtick, willya? And maybe consider maturing past the Limbaugh-O'Reilly junior high level. Or just stick a falafel in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top