Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-06-2012, 02:06 PM
 
876 posts, read 709,156 times
Reputation: 377

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
So you think Blaming Bush will win?
Lets say Obama does win and i think he will, does he get the blame after 8 years?
It might get him in the winner's circle with another term. But, he will not take credit until another, effective pres comes in and fixes what he has ruined. That may be a very long time. The thing is, presidents before him have dealt with harder times than he. He asked America to take him on and said that he could fix things. To bad they have gotten worse. America has not seen this bad of a "recovery" since the "Great Depression". Either obama is ineffective or his agenda is totally different than the prosperity of America. Either way, he should go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-06-2012, 02:10 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,014,226 times
Reputation: 5455
Democrats have been running against Bush since '00. They somehow think he is still in the race. Elizabeth Warren explained how horrible the economy and country is now as if Bush had been president the last 4 years during her speech. As if they are running against somebody who created this mess the last 4 years. I wonder if she even realizes Obama has been president the last 4 years?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 02:11 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,014,226 times
Reputation: 5455
I remember a clip of Pelosi when somebody actually asked her when the democrats would stop blaming Bush. She said rather matter of factly that when things turn around they would. Hey why change when all the useful idiots keep lapping the nonsense up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 02:17 PM
 
2,962 posts, read 5,001,666 times
Reputation: 1887
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
I remember a clip of Pelosi when somebody actually asked her when the democrats would stop blaming Bush. She said rather matter of factly that when things turn around they would. Hey why change when all the useful idiots keep lapping the nonsense up.
Well we had Clinton at the DNC summarizing his years and Obama's position. Why not W at the RNC hyping Romney? I'd have to say Clinton left under less than ideal conditions. You play to your strenghts. I still hear cons complaining about Carter and Clinton. And of course pining for the Reagan years.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 02:27 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,014,226 times
Reputation: 5455
Clinton put himself back on stage so of course folks are gonna complain about him. What do you expect? You think republicans will pull a Chris Mathews and fawn and squeak about how if Bill landed on Mars he would be able to mate with aliens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 02:33 PM
 
876 posts, read 709,156 times
Reputation: 377
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Clinton put himself back on stage so of course folks are gonna complain about him. What do you expect? You think republicans will pull a Chris Mathews and fawn and squeak about how if Bill landed on Mars he would be able to mate with aliens.
Yeah, that was weird. Someone should reign him in. He and Joe need to sit a few plays out. I'm afraid after obama's speech tonight, that Chris might try to hump him. That is a very bad thought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 02:37 PM
 
3,183 posts, read 7,206,442 times
Reputation: 1818
Romney, Bush and the entire group of cartel members in control when Bush was pretending to be the president are pretty much the same. They represent the 1% would are quickly getting control of 99% of the wealth. People know who was president when they lost their savings and jobs and homes...and it wasnt the Obama crowd in charge then.... Bush got his 8 years now its Obamas turn to get his eight...its only fair
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 02:38 PM
 
2,962 posts, read 5,001,666 times
Reputation: 1887
Yeah, that was weird. Someone should reign him in. He and Joe need to sit a few plays out. I'm afraid after obama's speech tonight, that Chris might try to hump him. That is a very bad thought.





You two are getting beyond bizarre....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 03:00 PM
 
876 posts, read 709,156 times
Reputation: 377
Quote:
Originally Posted by crestliner View Post
Romney, Bush and the entire group of cartel members in control when Bush was pretending to be the president are pretty much the same. They represent the 1% would are quickly getting control of 99% of the wealth. People know who was president when they lost their savings and jobs and homes...and it wasnt the Obama crowd in charge then.... Bush got his 8 years now its Obamas turn to get his eight...its only fair
It is only fair? Why? Bush got another chance because his record didn't stink at the beginning of his second run. obama's does. I know he loves to play some golf,but there are no mulligans in politics. If your record stinks, you get booted. Name one job that you can have for four years where your record is this rotten and you get to keep it?

The amount of money he spends and the jobs that are lost would cause any CEO to lose his job. Why is it "fair" for him to keep his job when he is not doing it correctly.

-If 8.3% of the students in a teacher's class failed that class for four years, would you fire that teacher?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 03:14 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,014,226 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by seahawkgirl View Post
Yeah, that was weird. Someone should reign him in. He and Joe need to sit a few plays out. I'm afraid after obama's speech tonight, that Chris might try to hump him. That is a very bad thought.
I just envisioned Mathews charging the stage and dry humping Obama's leg. Not a pretty picture. I may go see a psychiatrist now. lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top