Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So now we should listen to movie stars telling us about politics?
Because usually you guys are telling us the opposite
Unlike some of the zombies here on CD, "movie stars" are not all superficial twits. Many of those formerly employed in the movie and TV industries have gone on to successful careers in other fields. For instance, Ronald Reagan, Wayne Rogers, Sunny Bono and Fred Grandy. Clint Eastwood even served a term as the mayor of Carmel.
Unlike some of the zombies here on CD, "movie stars" are not all superficial twits. Many of those formerly employed in the movie and TV industries have gone on to successful careers in other fields. For instance, Ronald Reagan, Wayne Rogers, Sunny Bono and Fred Grandy. Clint Eastwood even served a term as the mayor of Carmel.
So the ones on the right are good, the ones on the left are idiot hollywood types, right?
This stuff isn't rocket science. If it was false, the one making the claim could be sued, or he could be arrested. This won't be challenged because the truth will come out.
Not true at all.
But you're right, it isn't rocket science...it's pretty freaking obvious that your "source" of "information" is merely a hate-blog with absolutely no evidence whatsoever.
Quote:
Yes, government destabilization, the military has known for years that homosexuals are a security risk. Just look at the wikileaks guy Bradley Manning.
How about we ask the military about how ending DADT completely destroyed the military and caused everyone in it to turn gay. Oh wait, it's the exact opposite.
You people are pathetic. Find a real problem to be concerned about, this is probably the most idiotic anti-Obama angle I've ever seen. Come at him for his lack of cojones in dealing with that do-nothing congress, but to say that he's secretly gay and part of a secret gay agenda to overthrow the government with homosexuality is not even dumb, it's completely insane.
Expect the usual members to come here and start posting their usual dismissive responses of anything that comes from WND, regardless of the countless links in the article to other sources.
So...... is it fair to say if I/we were to post a "breaking story" with Huffington Post as the only source, you (and other right-wingers) wouldn't call BS on it? I might have to test that theory, if you wanna take bets! C'mon now, even the WND themselves identify as a CONSERVATIVE news source. Thus, using them to prove an anti-Obama story is kinda like using Catholic News Daily to prove abortion is wrong.
WND: "Independent conservative news website with an emphasis on aggressive investigative reporting and gossip." And you think this qualifies as an unbiased source, when they're even described as having an emphasis on GOSSIP? Wow, just wow.
Quote:
I've always thought Obama was bisexual and still do.
1. Kevin DuJan claims he knows 2 people who knows this. He names no names, so his claim is anonymous hearsay.
2. Wayne Madsen claims it "is common knowledge." But he names no names, so his claim is also anonymous hearsay.
3. "WND spoke with" an anonymous member of the East Bank Club, where it was "known." So here we have anonymous hearsay of a guy repeating anonymous hearsay. For those paying attention, that's anonymous hearsay squared.
4. Larry Sinclair... a career criminal, con artist and felon who flunked the polygraph test he agreed to take and has been whining about it ever since... and has been unable to come up with a single person who corroborates the tiniest detail of his fictional encounter.
5. John Drew, who had a "feeling" Obama was gay, but never saw any gay activity.
6. Unattributed rumors regarding Reggie Love... more anonymous hearsay.
7. Obama wore a ring before he was married.
I am underwhelmed into a state of near catatonia by the completely vacuous nature of this entire stupid article.
Good analysis, but if we are precluding hearsay we should preclude impermissible as well so 4. is problematic, but aside from that
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
