Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-22-2012, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,180,106 times
Reputation: 21743

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stock56 View Post
The environmentalist fanatical whack jobs with the help of this administration are destroying this country's ability to become energy independent....The End of America!!!
Great. Another Josef Göbbels propaganda worshiper.

You are energy independent.

What do you import to provide electrical power? Absolutely nothing.

I just debunked your nonsense.

If the Environmentally-Challenged Dynamic Duo of Blow Job Bill and the Gorebot hadn't cancelled funding for IFRs, you might actually have a safe, viable long term energy provider in the form of fusion reactors -- which don't produce nuclear waste, since the "waste" of fusion reactors is fuel for other fusion reactors.

You also have plenty of natural gas to run gas-fired turbines to produce electricity. You don't necessarily need coal.

Energetically...

Mircea

Quote:
Originally Posted by hamellr View Post
And you are totally missing the point. By your argument, if the EPA was not around, the plants would not be closing, correct? But we both then posted pictures, before and after showing quite blatantly the EPA's direct effect on pollution in a specific city? So if the plants did not have to follow EPA standards, then your picture would not have been possible at all. If the EPA disappeared right now, how long do you think it would be before the original picture was a statement of things once again?
You don't need an EPA. The Pennsylvania EPA is just as qualified to make decisions, as are all State EPA offices.

If the people of Dimwitown, PA want changes, they will contact their State legislators and effect whatever changes they want. They don't need Big Daddy National Pseudo-Federal Pretend Government telling them what to do.

Constitutionally....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-22-2012, 03:47 PM
 
27,159 posts, read 15,334,701 times
Reputation: 12079
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
The EPA is not "forcing" any power plant to close. Nobody from the EPA will show up, remove all the workers, turn out the lights, shut down the furnaces and lock the gates. It is the OWNERS of those plants who will make the decision to close rather than meet the new requirements mandated by Congress.

It's their choice.


Like making the decision to get out of the way of a speeding semi or stay in the road in front of it.

Hmmm, which would you chose?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 03:49 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,021,070 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamellr View Post
And you are totally missing the point. By your argument, if the EPA was not around, the plants would not be closing, correct? But we both then posted pictures, before and after showing quite blatantly the EPA's direct effect on pollution in a specific city? So if the plants did not have to follow EPA standards, then your picture would not have been possible at all. If the EPA disappeared right now, how long do you think it would be before the original picture was a statement of things once again?
No you are missing the point. Nobody wants a town full of coal dust or what have you. What we have now is our government who is basing their energy and economic policy on "green energy" using the EPA to punish certain industries and favor others. Why didn't everybody die in your little town? They held a conference back in the fourties and left it up to the local municipalities to start cleaning the air up. Then the fed intervened in the fifties and we had the air pollution act and then the clean air act. All BEFORE your saviors the EPA were ever even around. Back then they worked together to clean things up they didn't focus on putting folks out of business like they are now. What we see now with this green carbon cutting nonsense is not cleaning up the air it is putting people out of work, closing business to shift things over to "green" nonsense that has no hope of competing unless everything else costs ten times more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 04:07 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,539,575 times
Reputation: 7807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Great. Another Josef Göbbels propaganda worshiper.

You are energy independent.

What do you import to provide electrical power? Absolutely nothing.

I just debunked your nonsense.

If the Environmentally-Challenged Dynamic Duo of Blow Job Bill and the Gorebot hadn't cancelled funding for IFRs, you might actually have a safe, viable long term energy provider in the form of fusion reactors -- which don't produce nuclear waste, since the "waste" of fusion reactors is fuel for other fusion reactors.

You also have plenty of natural gas to run gas-fired turbines to produce electricity. You don't necessarily need coal.

Energetically...

Mircea



You don't need an EPA. The Pennsylvania EPA is just as qualified to make decisions, as are all State EPA offices.

If the people of Dimwitown, PA want changes, they will contact their State legislators and effect whatever changes they want. They don't need Big Daddy National Pseudo-Federal Pretend Government telling them what to do.

Constitutionally....

Mircea

Why do we have a federal EPA in the first place? Do you think it might have something to do with the unwillingness or inability of state regulators to control pollution in the first place OR the fact that air and water pollution cannot be contained within state boundaries, leaving downwind and downstream citizens affected by lax regulations in a neighboring state with no way to prevent the poisoning of their environment?

If you answered yes to both questions, then you are correct.

Please tell me how eliminating the EPA now would prevent that happening again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 09:45 PM
 
9,846 posts, read 22,685,572 times
Reputation: 7738
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamellr View Post
Thank you for posting a picture that proves my point even more. Donora wouldn't look like that now if it hadn't been for the pesky EPA stepping in.
It would because the EPA didn't exist back then and by the time it did US Steel in that town was out of business.

Whoops.

It would be one thing if the EPA was an organization that protected US citizens but now it's just an ideological hack of central command authority dictating who what when where and how.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 09:47 PM
 
9,846 posts, read 22,685,572 times
Reputation: 7738
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
The EPA is not "forcing" any power plant to close. Nobody from the EPA will show up, remove all the workers, turn out the lights, shut down the furnaces and lock the gates. It is the OWNERS of those plants who will make the decision to close rather than meet the new requirements mandated by Congress.

It's their choice.
It is forcing the plant to close when it financially crushes it. It is soft totalitarianism. As wacko Ken Salazar said, they'll put a boot on the neck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 09:55 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,768,347 times
Reputation: 5691
Since when is expecting coal-fired plants to meet air standards an act of war?

Everyone should be able to breathe clean air, period.

The EPA does not shut down plants that don't pollute.

Seems like some of the folks here want to take us back to the 1960s, when rivers burned and people died and the Bald Eagle was heading for extinction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 10:08 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,080,948 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamellr View Post
.."and factors including cheap natural gas,"...

states the article. But lets go ahead and keep ignoring facts and blame the EVIL and ANTI-American EPA. Never mind that the EPA was created by a Republican, and cleaned up issues like this:


(Picture was taken at Noon in Donora, Pennsylvania, 1948)

I'm all for going back to acid rain. We don't have enough and wildlife and nature has been thriving WAY too much.
That's because of all the steel mills that were in that area. Instead of picture from 1948 taken near an area with heavy industry how about one from modern plant?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 10:09 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,080,948 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamellr View Post
Thank you for posting a picture that proves my point even more. Donora wouldn't look like that now if it hadn't been for the pesky EPA stepping in.
-or- it might because there is no more steel mills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 10:18 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,080,948 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
Why do we have a federal EPA in the first place? Do you think it might have something to do with the unwillingness or inability of state regulators to control pollution in the first place OR the fact that air and water pollution cannot be contained within state boundaries, leaving downwind and downstream citizens affected by lax regulations in a neighboring state with no way to prevent the poisoning of their environment?
Before Christie came into office NJ was part of lawsuit where bordering states were suing other states over pollution, in the case of NJ they were suing PA. I actually agreed with NJ's postion and my solution to the problem was quite simple. Close all the power plants generating excessive energy not needed in PA and pull the plug on power flowing into NJ. There is no reason the residents of PA should suffer the enviromental consequences of NJ's consumption.

Sounds like a fair an equitable solution?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top