Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, on the one hand ... the extremists complain (incorrectly) that the President doesn't pay enough attention to intelligence briefings, and on the other they complain (like a pig squeals) when he spends time with someone like the Secretary of State.
Well, on the one hand ... the extremists complain (incorrectly) that the President doesn't pay enough attention to intelligence briefings, and on the other they complain (like a pig squeals) when he spends time with someone like the Secretary of State.
Didn't take you long to start calling people names that call your obama out. What a good little liberal you are. Maybe one day obama will pat you on the head. The problem is that it is too little too late. People were attacked on American soil, they knew there was a threat, they didn't care, and they lied about it. Now obama wants to meet with someone to talk about it because it is his rear on the line. He only cares about himself. Why do you not have a problem with any of this? Have you truly been that brainwashed?
Well, on the one hand ... the extremists complain (incorrectly) that the President doesn't pay enough attention to intelligence briefings, and on the other they complain (like a pig squeals) when he spends time with someone like the Secretary of State.
Hillary doesn't provide the daily intell briefings. You need to understand what is even going on before YOU start squealing.
Well, on the one hand ... the extremists complain (incorrectly) that the President doesn't pay enough attention to intelligence briefings,
Incorrectly?
If it was incorrect then why did Jay Carney and Obama's Intelligence guy not dispute the story that Obama didn't attend Intelligence Briefings. And why did they make a point of saying he instead read them on an iPad?
Suddenly then AFTER our Ambassador is murdered, the WH thought it was important enough to release to the press that Obama was going to BEGIN attending Intelligence Briefings in person.
MAYBE it would have been a good idea to meet BEFORE you began lying to the American public about hwat happened instead of sending a UN Ambassador out armed with only lies?
It's not even so much that this terror attack was successful (from the terrorists point of view) and an Ambassador was murdered, although that's bad in itself.
But the COVER-UP is always the thing that brings you down.
Before reading everything...Rice has got to go...she is a pro and entirely responsible for "insisting" that the privileged information she was disclosing to the entire Nation was absolutely firm....No one had her by the short ones....its not a Communist Country ....She must be at very least cut off the payroll immediately. She serves absolutely no value in translating info across to a whole nation, what other damage has she caused ..insisting...."other things" to others which she personally favors for who cares what reason, job, whatever...the Rice communication cannot be trusted ....Rice has got to go without delay...I'm really firm on this.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.