Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The putrid hatred of the other is rife in this thread. The people responsible for this act of terror (quoting some American politician) have been apprehended.
Who is responsible? Instead of posting someone's opinion, why not watch this video where the same Republican who is criticizing the Obama administration is saying "yes, we voted to cut security for Libya" because it was not a priority. I have several sources, all on video, NOT a right wing talking point full of hypocrisy and double-talk. The author of the article you posted works for Fox news as a political analyst.
Stop living in your little bubble and watch this interview. How the heck can this man stand there and blame Obama for lack of security and in a few seconds, when asked if he voted against adding security say "ABSOLUTELY! IT WASN'T A PRIORITY."
Give me a freaking break, now you want to put the blame on Romney? And you don't like my source, so you post crap from Media Matters? Wow, you have zero integrity or respect for the truth.
He referred to any act of terror, but then he blamed this act on a video which would make it a spontaneous act, similar to second degree murder as opposed to a planned act which would be like first degree murder. So even though he did use the words 'act of terror', he could not admitted it was an actual planned act of terror or he would have to explain why he left the embassy wide open to a terrorist attack.
He referred to any act of terror, but then he blamed this act on a video which would make it a spontaneous act, similar to second degree murder as opposed to a planned act which would be like first degree murder. So even though he did use the words 'act of terror', he could not admit it was an actual planned act of terroror he would have to explain why he left the embassy wide open to a terrorist attack.
Exactly. Any intelligent person can clearly understand that.
No need. We already know Obama didn't call the attack in Benghazi an act of terror. The proof is in the transcript.
Again Romney agreed that act of terror was an appropriate term. And the Presidents used acts. Certainly the WTC was in that set. So he was describing a number of items...
You would therefore have to decide he was talking about items other than Benghazi...which would not be in the context of the remarks.
You simply can't get where you are going on these remarks.
Footfalls echo in the memory Down the passage which we did not take Towards the door we never opened Into the rose garden
- T.S. Eliot, "Burnt Norton" - Four Quartets, 1943.
Reprinted in Hannibal, 1999 by Thomas Harris
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
