Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is it really supposed to be news that a pro-lifer thinks all babies are a gift from god? Why would any news show obsess over this religious opinion made by Murdock?
Interview the Pope, and he will say the same thing. Are you going to make the Pope out to be a RWNJ too?
The Pope was in the Hitler Youth, has contributed to the spread of AIDS in Africa and has protected Child molesters. He's worse than a RWNJ, far worse.
The fact that a man elected to public office can actually say that a rape baby is a gift from "god" (and not Satan) should be news everywhere.
You can't possibly think that Fox "News" isn't biased, can you?
Are you one of those brainless morons who actually believes the slogan "Fair and Balanced"? Do you also think that North Korea is a Democracy because they advertise themselves (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) that way?
Great find, it shows loud and clear how Fox is nothing but ultra-right wing propaganda that spreads nothing but distortions and lies.
Drudge is the leader in all of this. I used to visit his website before 2008, and found that, while he leaned right, he typically had some links to both sides of an issue and didn't outright ignore stories.
Now? He's gone so far over the edge that I don't even bother. He has never, not once, covered anything remotely negative about Romney, while he slams Obama day after day after day, many times with inflammatory headlines that twist the words of the stories he links to. It's BS, and it's obvious. I have no respect for people who attempt to legitimize that ****.
Opinion? How is that Fox Zombies can't hear facts? How can we watch the same video and come away with two different conclusions.
Simple, because 0bama never called the Benghazi attack an act of terror, in his Rose Garden speech, he said "No act of terror," after referencing the first 9/11 attack.
I've been over this many times, eight times, 0bama spoke directly about the attack and he never called it a terror attack, and never called the people engaged in the attack terrorists.
If the White house wants to call something a "terrorist attack" this is how they do it:
The BBC reports that earlier today "A huge car bomb has killed at least eight people and injured 78 in central Beirut, Lebanese officials say."
Hours later, the White House released a statement condemning the "terrorist attack."
"The United States condemns in the strongest terms the terrorist attack today in Beirut that killed Lebanese Internal Security Forces Information Bureau Director Wissam al-Hassan and at least seven others, and wounded dozens more," said national security council spokesman Tommy Vietor. W.H. Immediately Calls Bombing in Beirut 'Terrorist Attack'
Thanks for posting! It's all in the headline. You know, tabloid garbage enacts this same policy with their headlines. Fox News is equivalent to Tabloid media.
I think every pro-life Christian would say the same thing. This is what liberal reporters do, ask a Christian, "do you respect all life?" and the person says 'yes," and suddenly its proof positive of how outrageous a nut job the person is.
On the flip side, reporters can interview a democrat who wants abortion on demand, any time, all the time, and the reporter yawns. It's not news that a dem wants a free for all on abortion, because the reporter agrees with that view, and people like you do not think it's news, and do not expect Maddow on MSNBC to waste any time reporting it..
Simple, because 0bama never called the Benghazi attack an act of terror, in his Rose Garden speech, he said "No act of terror," after referencing the first 9/11 attack.
I've been over this many times, eight times, 0bama spoke directly about the attack and he never called it a terror attack, and never called the people engaged in the attack terrorists.
If the White house wants to call something a "terrorist attack" this is how they do it:
The BBC reports that earlier today "A huge car bomb has killed at least eight people and injured 78 in central Beirut, Lebanese officials say."
Hours later, the White House released a statement condemning the "terrorist attack."
"The United States condemns in the strongest terms the terrorist attack today in Beirut that killed Lebanese Internal Security Forces Information Bureau Director Wissam al-Hassan and at least seven others, and wounded dozens more," said national security council spokesman Tommy Vietor. W.H. Immediately Calls Bombing in Beirut 'Terrorist Attack'
Reagan refused to call the Bombing of Beirut an act of terror.
It is semantics. Who cares if either president called it an act of terror or acts of terror. It was an act of terror. This is the stupidest argument that I have ever heard and the fact that it is still continuing is the sad part.
Drudge is the leader in all of this. I used to visit his website before 2008, and found that, while he leaned right, he typically had some links to both sides of an issue and didn't outright ignore stories.
Now? He's gone so far over the edge that I don't even bother. He has never, not once, covered anything remotely negative about Romney, while he slams Obama day after day after day, many times with inflammatory headlines that twist the words of the stories he links to. It's BS, and it's obvious. I have no respect for people who attempt to legitimize that ****.
His claim to fame was the semen stained blue dress. This put him on the map! It's been down hill ever since (not that he was ever up the hill).
The spin from Fox on various news stories will be very interesting and likely humorous if Romney ends up winning the election. The headlines of various events after the election, that is.
Well Obama can't undo the blaming of the attack to a lame video. IF he knew it was a terrorist attack than it is more than stupid to keep blaming the lame video. Then on top of that the maker of the video is in jail and stays there.
Let Obama explain that. Not that I am holding my breath he ever will. When will the guy ever be released? The video is suppose to be forgotten now even when Obama went before the UN and blamed it. We have tapes, oops. Guess the guy will be released out the back door someday, if he is ever released.
Well Obama can't undo the blaming of the attack to a lame video. IF he knew it was a terrorist attack than it is more than stupid to keep blaming the lame video. Then on top of that the maker of the video is in jail and stays there.
Let Obama explain that. Not that I am holding my breath he ever will. When will the guy ever be released? The video is suppose to be forgotten now even when Obama went before the UN and blamed it. We have tapes, oops. Guess the guy will be released out the back door someday, if he is ever released.
Did you read the thread title. what has this to do with Fox lies?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The headlines of various events after the election, that is.
