Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Homosexuality is immoral, it is wrong. No one in the world can argue as it is undeniably an argument against the opinion of nature, in every way including example. Its not an argument with man.
Homosexuality deliberately bigots the naturally intended in the most anti life way imaginable, both by flourish and now, HIV as gays are fully known to be the instruments of cause in fueling the aids epidemic.
Meh, you're wrong on all counts. Homosexuality has existed and been documented throughout various societies whether flourishing or not. It's been documented in many other species. It's probably because sex has come to serve as much more than just a strictly biological reproductive act not just for humans but for a lot of species in the world. I have no idea what "instruments of cause in fueling" is supposed to mean, but if you mean to pin HIV on homosexuals specifically for creating the virus, then you're pretty far off the rocker. Also, what about stuff like heart diseases, various cancers, down syndrome, alcoholism, etc. basically all diseases and syndromes in the world? Do you have specific groups you'd like to pin down for each thing? Is this a new fashionable drinking game?
I'll start: West Samoans - Epilepsy
Who's next?
So has theft.... Having read, you've been well told.
It's all "framing" the arguement in soundbites....more important than content.
the traditional marriage is between a man and woman,,,thats what marriage is/was
the dems, are masters at framing, demonizing, because they have the mainstream media to trumpet, for them..
they turned gay marriage into "marriage equality" which implies, if you oppose it, you arent being fair....
republicans need to lern from this..
spend less time on content and more time on framing the arguement,
If you oppose tax paying gay and lesbian citizens having the same rights and protections as tax paying straight citizens, then of course you 'aren't being fair'.How could that not be obvious to any rational thinking person?
Meh, you're wrong on all counts. Homosexuality has existed and been documented throughout various societies whether flourishing or not. It's been documented in many other species. It's probably because sex has come to serve as much more than just a strictly biological reproductive act not just for humans but for a lot of species in the world. I have no idea what "instruments of cause in fueling" is supposed to mean, but if you mean to pin HIV on homosexuals specifically for creating the virus, then you're pretty far off the rocker. Also, what about stuff like heart diseases, various cancers, down syndrome, alcoholism, etc. basically all diseases and syndromes in the world? Do you have specific groups you'd like to pin down for each thing? Is this a new fashionable drinking game?
I'll start: West Samoans - Epilepsy
Who's next?
Conservative religious zealots - Insanity, Sociopathy, Cognitive dysfunction....
The church seems to care more about keeping gay americans from marrying than providing for people in poverty these days.
This is part of the reason why I stopped giving money to the church and then stopped going altogether. Besides not agreeing anymore with the church on these topics, I cannot fund hate speech. Then as someone else pointed out, the church is caring more about what 2 consenting people do outside of the church than they do about what their own priests are doing within the church. Their priorities are completely screwed up.
The union of two men or two women is not equal to the union of a man and a woman. Seems to me the Catholic Church spent two million dollars to dope slap America.
Churches most certainly do have business sticking their noses into the issue of marriage. Church leaders are usually the ones officiating these covenants. They don't want to be put in the position of being forced to officiate homosexual unions, or have their tax exemption taken away. Or, to be charged with "hate speech" for daring to say what the Bible clearly states about homosexual behavior. This is not too far away, or far-fetched, is happening in Europe already.
Yes, homosexuals should have the freedom to form a union and get benefits in our pluralistic society. But, absolutely the church ( all denominations which still uphold the Bible ) has a right and responsibility to preserve the sanctity of marriage as we understand it. Churches should never be forced to participate in or condone a lifestyle just because the state or society at large decides to sanction it.
No one has said Churches should be forced to perform same-sex marriage. This is about CIVIL Marriage and LEGAL Marriage. The Church has every right to dictate the laws of their Church, but they shouldn't dictate state or federal laws.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
