Obama's IQ (death, school, Chicago, state)

[hawkeye2009]

I have found it hilarious, yet predictable, that liberals have claimed that Obama is a "genius" (IQ over 140).

As we know, genetics are the main predictor of IQ. If Obama was as brilliant as the left claims, why-

1. are not his parents noted to have "genius" IQs?

2. was he a self proclaimed "poor student"?

3. has he refused to release his academic transcripts, if they in fact reveal a "straight A" student?

4. did the faculty at the Univ of Chicago consider him "lazy and incompetent"?


Obama is an imbecile, as the factual data clearly shows.

[Goinback2011]

90 at best for Zero.

His mom was an imbecile. His Dad was also probably a 90.

[sickofnyc]

Ater four ****ing years the same ****. You people are worse that Chinese water torture. Don't you bore yourselves to death?

[Egbert]

Dumb folks don't get to be editor of Harvard Law Review. If Obama were an imbecile there is no ****ing way he would have gotten that position.

[ChrisC]

Originally Posted by sickofnyc

Ater four ****ing years the same ****. You people are worse that Chinee water torture. Don't you bore yourselves to death?

Absolutely. Let's go back to talking about Bush's IQ. How many years did that go on?

[parfleche]

IQ and lack of common sense can happen.obama proved it

[Rakin]

Originally Posted by Egbert

Dumb folks don't get to be editor of Harvard Law Review. If Obama were an imbecile there is no ****ing way he would have gotten that position.

At the time it was a popularity vote. What has the man accomplished ?

Never tried a case. Was not a professor. Never had a real job.

No real world experience.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...ht_114271.html

[Michigantown]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

I have found it hilarious, yet predictable, that liberals have claimed that Obama is a "genius" (IQ over 140).

As we know, genetics are the main predictor of IQ. If Obama was as brilliant as the left claims, why-

1. are not his parents noted to have "genius" IQs?

2. was he a self proclaimed "poor student"?

3. has he refused to release his academic transcripts, if they in fact reveal a "straight A" student?

4. did the faculty at the Univ of Chicago consider him "lazy and incompetent"?


Obama is an imbecile, as the factual data clearly shows.

first problem

[Knox Harrington]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

I have found it hilarious, yet predictable, that liberals have claimed that Obama is a "genius" (IQ over 140).

As we know, genetics are the main predictor of IQ. If Obama was as brilliant as the left claims, why-

1. are not his parents noted to have "genius" IQs?

2. was he a self proclaimed "poor student"?

3. has he refused to release his academic transcripts, if they in fact reveal a "straight A" student?

4. did the faculty at the Univ of Chicago consider him "lazy and incompetent"?


Obama is an imbecile, as the factual data clearly shows.

There are many things wrong with your premises and your conclusion.

First, we do NOT know that "genetics are the main predictor of IQ." That is a completely ridiculous statement.

Second, you assume that someone who is a "poor student" and has been called "lazy and incompetent" CANNOT have a high IQ. You have ABSOLUTELY no evidence to support that conclusion.

[Egbert]

Originally Posted by Rakin

At the time it was a popularity vote. What has the man accomplished ?

Never tried a case. Was not a professor. Never had a real job.

No real world experience.

I don't think you understand how Law Review works. It is not a popularity vote. Just to get on Law Review, you have to generally speaking A. Be at the top of your law school class grade wise, B. Win an anonymous writing competition, and/or C. Do both. It is one of the most sought after positions in Law Schools and is basically only for the very top performing students. Just to get on means you are probably at the top of your class. It is not something that is a popularity vote and it is not something an imbecile could do.