Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-25-2012, 01:08 PM
 
3,740 posts, read 3,072,481 times
Reputation: 895

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
and that is exactly what we need to deal with this deficit and have a fair tax code. I see no reason why the budget should be balenced on people who work for their money.
What a pathetic, emotional, knee-jerk excuse of a post. The more you do to deter investment, i.e. RISK-taking, the less jobs there will be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-25-2012, 01:08 PM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,424,382 times
Reputation: 1179
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post
Add "economically illiterate" to the list, as well. If an employer wishes to keep employees, he/she must generally offer competitive wages. In a market economy, if an employer refuses to raise wages, even as tax and health care costs on employees rise, employees will look elsewhere.
lol, 26 million people who lost their jobs, now looking for a job of equal or better pay sounds like the makings of a competitive economy to me. It is now an employers market dimwit, meaning there are more people looking for jobs than there are good jobs. When that happens, employers don't have to pay higher salaries because there is always someone else who will work for a little less. And Obamacare! They will hire as few full timers as they can. But feel free to look elsewhere... have fun


Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post
If you lived in a state in which the tax burden for the masses was dramatically lowered, you would find wages stagnate. I you were in a state in which the tax burden on individuals was dramatically increased, you would find wages start to increase to keep pace.
Raise taxes = increased wages... really. Explain please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2012, 01:09 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,157,597 times
Reputation: 2264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
The legitimatge needs of the state amount to about 30% of what is actually spent. The rest is just playing favorites in exchange for votes, and leftist attemps at social engineering - both illlegitimate.
Please list the "legitimate" areas/programs of the federal government.

BTW, does using the tax code to give preferences to married couples amount to "social engineering?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2012, 01:09 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,395,835 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
The legitimatge needs of the state amount to about 30% of what is actually spent. The rest is just playing favorites in exchange for votes, and leftist attemps at social engineering - both illlegitimate.
Not really debt service and military spending are way more then 50% of the budget. In fact, most of the "liberal" part of the budget is 15% or less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2012, 01:10 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,395,835 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
What a pathetic, emotional, knee-jerk excuse of a post. The more you do to deter investment, i.e. RISK-taking, the less jobs there will be.
That has not been proven ever...that there is a relationship between growth and investment income tax rates. In fact, very good economists have basically found that rather then encouraging growth all it does is encourage excess money to be used for dividends and stock buybacks rather then investment in expansion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2012, 01:11 PM
 
3,740 posts, read 3,072,481 times
Reputation: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
LOL. So it doesn't matter what any of the of the other taxes? You aren't thinking this through. How can you make any sort of assessment if anyone's taxes are too high by just looking at income taxes?
That's the case at the bar right now. We'll talk about your trifle-of-an-issue in some other thread.

Stop throwing RED HERRINGS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2012, 01:12 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,157,597 times
Reputation: 2264
Quote:
Originally Posted by eRayP View Post
lol, 26 million people who lost their jobs sounds like the makings of a competitive economy to me. It is now an employers market dimwit, meaning there are more people looking for jobs than there are good jobs. When that happens, employers don't have to pay higher salaries because there is always someone else who will work for a little less. And Obamacare! They will hire as few full timers as they can. But feel free to look elsewhere... have fun
Of course in a recession or depression employers are not generally raising wages. In a normal economy, of course wages tend to react to tax increases.

The whole issue of not hiring full-timers started long before Obama took office. It has most to do with spiraling health care costs, due in large part to the most inefficient bureaucracy on Earth, the private health insurance industry, which operates at 30-40% overhead. Medicare, by contrast, operates at something like 3%. Can you tell me why we need private health insurance companies, other than to dissuade businesses from hiring full-time workers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2012, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post
Of course in a recession or depression employers are not generally raising wages. In a normal economy, of course wages tend to react to tax increases.

The whole issue of not hiring full-timers started long before Obama took office. It has most to do with spiraling health care costs, due in large part to the most inefficient bureaucracy on Earth, the private health insurance industry, which operates at 30-40% overhead. Medicare, by contrast, operates at something like 3%. Can you tell me why we need private health insurance companies, other than to dissuade businesses from hiring full-time workers?
But now part time is capped at under 30 hours rather than under 40 hours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2012, 01:17 PM
 
3,740 posts, read 3,072,481 times
Reputation: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
That has not been proven ever.
Every advanced economy on earth uses a sort of preferential tax treatment for income devired from risk-taking, i.e. Investment.

I think all those learned people who created, and support such treament are a bit better at juding than some bunch of jealousy-driven, shallow-thinking, idiot liberal fools.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2012, 01:18 PM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,424,382 times
Reputation: 1179
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post
Of course in a recession or depression employers are not generally raising wages. In a normal economy, of course wages tend to react to tax increases.
Ok, so I am still waiting to hear your theory on how raising taxes helps increase wages?

And you think if Obama gets his way and raises taxes that you businesses will give employees a raise? And HappyTexan is right.. due to Obamacare companies are not only freezing wages, laying off workers, they are also capping hours.

We got all kinds of good stuff from putting Obama back in office.

More lay-offs
Freeze wages
Capping employee work hours
Printing more money
Devaluing the value of the money you do earn (now buys less stuff)
Higher gas prices
Poorer healthcare
Higher number of people on welfare

All kind of goodies lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top