Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm actually hoping guns get banned, that way Southern and Western states will seriously consider secession.
The liberals would love to live in a world without guns and whites who are proud of their heritage, but they tremble at the thought of the white taxpayer, farmer, livestock rancher, etc. leaving the union.
Secession and Balkanization is an eventuality, might as well be sooner rather than later. And when the southern states secede, maybe they can ship their "diversity" to the northeast where they will be more appreciated for their "vibrancy" and "enrichment". They wouldn't enjoy living in a conservative country anyway, so it's a win win.
If your government discriminated against your race, I would expect you to object.
Then again, there is a distinct possibility that you are a guilt ridden white liberal, tucked away in the suburbs, who supports policies that affect poor whites nationwide.
But hey, at least those poor whites get to keep the "privilege" they were born with.
Then the red states in the Deep South would have to find some other sugar-daddy to leech off, since they won't have us liberal blue-state taxpayers to subsidize their welfare checks.
I'm actually hoping guns get banned, that way Southern and Western states will seriously consider secession.
The liberals would love to live in a world without guns and whites who are proud of their heritage, but they tremble at the thought of the white taxpayer, farmer, livestock rancher, etc. leaving the union.
Secession and Balkanization is an eventuality, might as well be sooner rather than later. And when the southern states secede, maybe they can ship their "diversity" to the northeast where they will be more appreciated for their "vibrancy" and "enrichment". They wouldn't enjoy living in a conservative country anyway, so it's a win win.
What you people fail to comprehend is they start with the "others" taking away their rights etc when they are done with them then they start on "your" rights etc.
Then the red states in the Deep South would have to find some other sugar-daddy to leech off, since they won't have us liberal blue-state taxpayers to subsidize their welfare checks.
Red states in the Deep South have the highest percentage of blacks than any other region. Once the "liberal" pets in these states flock to the states where their liberal masters stay, the south won't have this issue any longer.
And most Southerners, white and black, know how to hunt, fish, build, etc. They will be just fine without the northern liberal social scientists, bankers, cubicle warriors, etc. Those types will be the ones running to the hunters, farmers, gun owners, etc. when this house of cards collapses.
What you people fail to comprehend is they start with the "others" taking away their rights etc when they are done with them then they start on "your" rights etc.
I'm actually hoping guns get banned, that way Southern and Western states will seriously consider secession.
The liberals would love to live in a world without guns and whites who are proud of their heritage, but they tremble at the thought of the white taxpayer, farmer, livestock rancher, etc. leaving the union.
Secession and Balkanization is an eventuality, might as well be sooner rather than later. And when the southern states secede, maybe they can ship their "diversity" to the northeast where they will be more appreciated for their "vibrancy" and "enrichment". They wouldn't enjoy living in a conservative country anyway, so it's a win win.
1.) Many liberals are white themselves but realize that everyone, regardless of race, gender, or sexual orientation is deserving of the same rights as white males.
2.) Nobody trembles at the thought of anyone leaving the union. Most think it is cowardly when people are unable to face ideological differences and have, as their only response, a childish reaction at their disposal. Most also think that such talk is utterly un-American and un-patriotic.
3.) Most people have no interest in banning guns - although many are arguing that we should more tightly regulate SOME types of firearms.
4.) It is obvious that you haven't paid attention at all - you are showing nothing but emotional grand-standing that is simply not fact-based. Oh, and paranoia, of course. You see, as soon as you start talking communism, fascism, and Nazis, you are outing yourself as being out to lunch.
1.) Many liberals are white themselves but realize that everyone, regardless of race, gender, or sexual orientation is deserving of the same rights as white males.
2.) Nobody trembles at the thought of anyone leaving the union. Most think it is cowardly when people are unable to face ideological differences and have, as their only response, a childish reaction at their disposal. Most also think that such talk is utterly un-American and un-patriotic.
3.) Most people have no interest in banning guns - although many are arguing that we should more tightly regulate SOME types of firearms.
4.) It is obvious that you haven't paid attention at all - you are showing nothing but emotional grand-standing that is simply not fact-based.
1) Those white liberals support and enact legislation that discriminates against white males based solely on their race. It isn't blacks or Hispanics writing those laws. They are racists who push race based legislation and thrive on identity politics.
2) These ideological differences cannot be solved. Conservatives (real ones, not neocons), will never accept affirmative action, a godless society, gun control, resistribution of their wealth, etc. Prepare for Balkanization within a decade.
3) That was the argument the Brits and Aussies were given. Banning "assault rifles" is step one. The undermining of the 2nd amendment has been going on for decades, and the leftists will exploit any tragedy to push their ideology.
4) Whether or not I am using "emotion based" logic is subjective. But you may be right, in that case, I will have to keep a tighter leash on my arguments.
Red states in the Deep South have the highest percentage of blacks than any other region. Once the "liberal" pets in these states flock to the states where their liberal masters stay, the south won't have this issue any longer.
And most Southerners, white and black, know how to hunt, fish, build, etc. They will be just fine without the northern liberal social scientists, bankers, cubicle warriors, etc. Those types will be the ones running to the hunters, farmers, gun owners, etc. when this house of cards collapses.
Are you equating black democratic voters to pets? Yeah, there isn't any racism in you
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
