Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The man reportedly packed his car with firecrackers and a gas tank and tried to set the vehicle alight.
State-run Jinghua Times said the students, in the northern Hebei province, were leaving school for a lunch break when the car hit them.
China has seen several attacks on schools in recent years, including a knife attack two weeks ago.
Once China gets car control and knife control up and running violence against kids should cease, thank goodness.
Another of these posts that takes an item that could possibly be used to commit a violent act and compares it to an item DESIGNED with nothing but a violent act as it's PRIMARY and ONLY purpose.
Another of these posts that takes an item that could possibly be used to commit a violent act and compares it to an item DESIGNED with nothing but a violent act as it's PRIMARY and ONLY purpose.
Infantile musings do nothing for your cause.
How is propelling a thousand pound hunk of metal forward at 65 miles per hour "non-violent"?
Another of these posts that takes an item that could possibly be used to commit a violent act and compares it to an item DESIGNED with nothing but a violent act as it's PRIMARY and ONLY purpose.
Infantile musings do nothing for your cause.
Guns, of course, are the opposite of what leftist big-govt whiners keep trying to make people believe. Their primary purpose is defense and deterrence, not death. The leftists can only see the death, as usual, and so they think (or hope) others will see only that too.
As usual, study after study (including those done by the U.S. Dept. of Justice under leftists such as Bill Clinton and Janet Reno) has shown that guns stop or prevent far more crimes than they cause, and so they fulfill their primary purpose admirably.
The leftists' efforts to get rid of them, are essentially efforts to increase the number of crimes and deaths, far more than they will ever increase the safety of the law-abiding. That's something else the leftists are trying their best not to see.
Trying to ban and remove guns from the law-abiding, is the government-uber-alles equivalent of trying to remove fire from the life of man because it may burn him, or removing all water because it may drown him.
Guns, of course, are the opposite of what leftist big-govt whiners keep trying to make people believe. Their primary purpose is defense and deterrence, not death. The leftists can only see the death, as usual, and so they think (or hope) others will see only that too.
As usual, study after study (including those done by the U.S. Dept. of Justice under leftists such as Bill Clinton and Janet Reno) has shown that guns stop or prevent far more crimes than they cause, and so they fulfill their primary purpose admirably.
The leftists' efforts to get rid of them, are essentially efforts to increase the number of crimes and deaths, far more than they will ever increase the safety of the law-abiding. That's something else the leftists are trying their best not to see.
Guns also provide the means to eat for many families who don't exactly choose to live near grocery stores.
Liberals forget that in places like Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and the Dakotas there are still some American families that live off of the land and don't wish to become slaves to Uncle Sam.
Guns also provide the means to eat for many families who don't exactly choose to live near grocery stores.
Liberals forget that in places like Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and the Dakotas there are still some American families that live off of the land and don't wish to become slaves to Uncle Sam.
Liberals have got nothing to do with this debate you're making a hash of.
Here's a thought for you: Anyone living off the land in Idaho, Wyoming and the Dakotas would be ashamed to be caught out hunting with anything with a 20 shot clip or magazine and you know it!
If they are using an assault weapon to do the table setting; they AIN'T no hunter!
I have nothing but disdain for these idiots that sit up in a tree with garbage bait below so they can kill themselves a bear. THAT little *sport* has nothing whatsoever to do with hunting.
Putting meat on the table needs nothing more than a three shot weapon, max, and anyone who jumps on here to state otherwise is going to make a complete and abject fool of themselves.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
