Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-05-2013, 07:38 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455

Advertisements

But hey lets just forget about it like all the swooners have done and just move FOREWARD to the next "green" lie.......

E Magazine states recycling just the plastic and metal alone from the CARS scraps would have saved 24 million barrels of oil. While some of the “Clunkers” were truly old, many of the almost 700,000 cars were still in perfectly good condition. In fact, many that qualified for the program were relatively “young,” with fuel efficiencies that rivaled newer cars.
And though the point was to get less fuel efficient cars off the roads, with only 690,000 traded in, and over 250 million registered in the U.S., the difference in pollutant levels seems pretty negligible.
But all that vehicular destruction did more than create unnecessary waste for the environment. It also had some far-reaching economic effects.
According to a recent TriCities op-ed from Mike Smith of Ralph Smith Motors in Virginia, CARS created a dearth of used cars, artificially driving up prices. For those who needed an affordable car, but didn’t qualify for the program, this increase in price meant affordable transportation was well out of reach. It also meant used-car dealers, most of whom are independently owned, small-business owners, had little to no stock. According to Smith, 122 Virginia dealers chose not to renew their licenses after that year.

Whoops
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-05-2013, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Chambersburg PA
1,738 posts, read 2,078,803 times
Reputation: 1483
Yes, and instead of getting a newer car with better gas mileage used...I ended up keeping my 1993 Dodge Grand Caravan. Maybe I would have been able to find something affordable if they would've scrapped the program and not the cars, or at least let those of us with true "clunkers" trade up for one of the ones that had been traded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2013, 08:07 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,568,283 times
Reputation: 6324
You can't fail if you don't try.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2013, 08:09 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
You can't fail if you don't try.
give obama credit, is think he has failed without trying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2013, 08:11 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
But hey lets just forget about it like all the swooners have done and just move FOREWARD to the next "green" lie.......

E Magazine states recycling just the plastic and metal alone from the CARS scraps would have saved 24 million barrels of oil. While some of the “Clunkers” were truly old, many of the almost 700,000 cars were still in perfectly good condition. In fact, many that qualified for the program were relatively “young,” with fuel efficiencies that rivaled newer cars.
And though the point was to get less fuel efficient cars off the roads, with only 690,000 traded in, and over 250 million registered in the U.S., the difference in pollutant levels seems pretty negligible.
But all that vehicular destruction did more than create unnecessary waste for the environment. It also had some far-reaching economic effects.
According to a recent TriCities op-ed from Mike Smith of Ralph Smith Motors in Virginia, CARS created a dearth of used cars, artificially driving up prices. For those who needed an affordable car, but didn’t qualify for the program, this increase in price meant affordable transportation was well out of reach. It also meant used-car dealers, most of whom are independently owned, small-business owners, had little to no stock. According to Smith, 122 Virginia dealers chose not to renew their licenses after that year.

Whoops

causation and correlation are 2 different things. that pretty much sums up the flaw in your argument. nothing you typed actually says one things caused the other, it just said they occurred one after the other or during the same time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2013, 08:11 PM
 
2,023 posts, read 5,313,628 times
Reputation: 2004
Who ever came up with that has got to be one of the biggest idiots to have ever lived.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2013, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,508,466 times
Reputation: 1450
Yep. Took almost 700,000 used cars out of operation. This caused existing used cars to become more valuable. So, people in the market for a used car had to pay more. And rich people don't buy used cars. Cash for Clunkers was essentially a tax for poor people in the market for a decent used car.

Since they crushed the cars that were traded in it took millions and millions of future used parts off the market also. Go to the junkyard to get a part? Gonna have to pay a lot more because Cash for Clunkers increased prices. Again, hurting poorer people.

Just like every other time the feds interfere in the free market. The poor get screwed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top