Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2013, 10:06 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,963 posts, read 17,908,356 times
Reputation: 10379

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
It isn't not the "left" that paints so-called conservatives as being racist, homophobic and generally bigoted it is the Republican Party that demonstrates those attributes at virtually every turn.
LMAO What a crock. The ones who falsely play the race card because their chosen one is a complete failure so they have to deflect. Can't talk about Obomneys plethora of failures so lets make it about race. Hypocritically from the ones who said "wouldn't it be good to have a black president" or "a woman".

Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
The media didn't make up these Republican characterizations
yes they did. They made it about race and you got suckered in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
so the let's blame the liberal media canard simply has no validity. If you don't make racist, homophobic, sexist, and derogatory statements about working people there would be nothing for the so-called liberal media to say.
LMAO so it's okay for dems to say racist things? Like "I'm voting for Obama because he's black". Bunch of filthy racists. The dems even got their religious leaders involved.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
When it comes to the today's Republican Party, Walt Kelly (with a few literary changes) said it best,
You have met the enemy and it is you!
Take a tip from the few best and brightest in the Republican Party, its time to take a deep breath and take out time to engage in some serious criticism-self-criticism.
Why listen to you? You're the enemy and you haven't backed many successful policies. Two big reasons, especially the last one.

Using force and coercion is for the weak minded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2013, 10:07 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,055,311 times
Reputation: 7698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
This canard that everyone is on the take is bogus. Who benefitted most from the bail outs in 2008? Which states take more receipts than they return to the treasury. Yep, good old red states. So, the stench of hypocrisy is a bit sickening. Enough with all the insults against your fellow citizens. The government is not the bogeyman, and folks who disagree with you are not parasites. Sure, some dems are scoundrels, but that applies to plenty of conservatives too. I'd guess most of us on both sides just want competent leaders who don't talk out their azzes all the time.
We're not talking about states, we're talking about voters so let's not try that BS ok? Even the most blue or red state has hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of voters from the other side of the isle. Many of the people I disagree with are indeed parasites, I'm sure many who I agree with partially are also parasites.

All I want are competent leaders who actually speak the truth and says what needs to be said instead of what people want to hear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 10:09 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,055,311 times
Reputation: 7698
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
I highly doubt someone who doesnt listen to talk radio or FOX news would convey the "lazy liberal" line

also Yes, Dems did get more votes, many of those votes came from Moderates who did see it as Obama's plans for this nation being better.
I couldn't care less what you highly doubt, I'm telling you that the idea that conservatives all follow right wing radio is ignorant and false.

Dems may have gotten moderate voters but they also got tons of votes from left wing, gubment loving leeches who couldn't care less about plans for this nation as long as that mailbox money keeps showing up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 10:11 PM
 
Location: Jawjah
2,468 posts, read 1,922,120 times
Reputation: 1100
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
The Republican party of Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and George Bush doubled down on using white resentment to maintain its power not realizing that the group that they thought they could manipulate would rise up and conduct a palace coup. They created the monster and like Dr. Frankenstein the monster eventually destroyed its creator.
Yes- the Southern Strategy: Southern strategy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 10:12 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,406,370 times
Reputation: 3086
They are at a point where the talking points they have used since the 1970s no longer work. Once more they really don't understand why they are losing and thus have trouble addressing their electability problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 10:15 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,055,311 times
Reputation: 7698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
They are at a point where the talking points they have used since the 1970s no longer work. Once more they really don't understand why they are losing and thus have trouble addressing their electability problems.
Which talking points?

  • Don't spend more than you make
  • Don't waste money on things you don't need
  • Save money for hard times
  • Don't F with people and they'll generally leave you alone
  • If someone Fs with you make sure they never do it again

No of course not, you're talking about talking points made up by left wing morons who want nothing more than to paint conservatives in a bad light because they can't possibly attack their common sense positions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 10:17 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,406,370 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
Which talking points?

  • Don't spend more than you make
  • Don't waste money on things you don't need
  • Save money for hard times
  • Don't F with people and they'll generally leave you alone
  • If someone Fs with you make sure they never do it again

No of course not, you're talking about talking points made up by left wing morons who want nothing more than to paint conservatives in a bad light because they can't possibly attack their common sense positions.
This is the perfect example. No introspection what so ever. Quite frankly it is your job to figure out why the folks you like so much are losing, and remember, if at first you don't succeed there is always another election cycle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 10:30 PM
 
Location: Back and Forth FRANCE
2,713 posts, read 3,027,576 times
Reputation: 1483
I was going to make a similar thread.
Conservatism seems to have been taken over by:

-Extremely stupid people.
-People who don't know female anatomy,
-Willing to nominate a witch.
-Seem to only care about "family values" when it convenient. And apparently do not believe those values they promote apply to themselves.
-People who seem not to know/or not care that google exist, and that anything that they say, can and will be fact checked by anyone who is smart enough not to blindly believe everything that comes out of their mouth.
- The libertarian/conspiracy theorist.
- And a crap load of hypocrites.

I'm not going to go as far as Race and Location being a problem. I see some improvement. People have the same Ideals but are "scared off" by some of the more vocal and "crazy."

I think it's more of a AGE/INTELLECT problem. As time goes on things cycle. Old Values with new Values, yet sadly though the majority is getting older, they seem less willing to change, and if they are changing they are going the wrong way.

I look at some who participated in the presidential primaries, it's really was a shame.
I look back at Romney, even though I voted for the guy and hoped he could turn everything around I wonder why was the guy even nominated, it is was sad he was the best choice.

Last edited by Jermaine88; 02-10-2013 at 10:41 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 10:44 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,214 posts, read 44,965,842 times
Reputation: 13748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
This canard that everyone is on the take is bogus. Who benefitted most from the bail outs in 2008? Fat cat republicans.
That makes no sense. In 2008, the Wall Street fat cats OVERWHELMINGLY supported and donated to Obama's campaign.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 11:21 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,648,238 times
Reputation: 3870
What is modern American conservatism trying to conserve? That's the core of the problem. Traditionally, conservatism was suspicious of "schemes" such as "free markets" or investing corporations with too much power, partly because doing so had the risk of harming local communities. The thing being conserved was a set of local relationships and businesses and community groups. Something like a slavish adherence to the diktats of big money was not conservative; it was activist.

I don't see much of that anymore in modern conservatism, and certainly not modern Republicanism. I don't see an emphasis on traditionally-conservative notions such as financial localism, suspicion of "trusts" and corporate collusion, and a wary eye toward big corporate institutions such as the mega-banks.

And perhaps worst of all, I still see a strong appetite for foreign policy interventionism - going abroad in search of monsters to destroy, in Iran or anywhere else. That was one of the main lines of attack leveled at Chuck Hagel during the recent hearings by Republicans - he wasn't enough of a warmonger.

If that's what modern conservatism has come to stand for, why would, for example, younger people be enthused about that? What's in it for them?

That's not to say that others don't also engage in some of the same sins, or have much in the way of answers, but pointing and shouting "But what about X!" when confronted with Y is more of a dodge than an actual argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top