Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2013, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,173,997 times
Reputation: 21743

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Reminds me of 1984, War is Peace. Either these people know nothing about these two men or are in complete denial.
What's the difference between Gandhi and John Gotti?

Where they lived.

Gotti would wave a friendly wave and smile a becoming smile, and all the while his henchmen were engaging in black-mail, extortion, fraud, money-laundering, drug smuggling, drug distribution, illegal gambling, graft, bribery, corruption, and many other other illegal and illicit acts......including the murder of others.

Gandhi was no different. Gandhi sat around all Buddha-like while his henchmen robbed banks, committed black-mail, extortion, fraud, money-laundering and assassinated public officials -- something you would call Terrorism™.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawg82 View Post
MLK was a registered Republican. How conservative he would have been . . . ??? But, the parties were very different back then.
Well, yes and no. There's a lot of different takes on it.

I think you could say that the Nixon-Carter Era with McGovern et al is where the changes started.

The Democrat Party at that time consisted of Northern Liberals, uh, Socialists by any other name, and then Southern Democrats. The Southern Democrats then equate to the Religious Right today. Because of the Civil War and Lincoln being a Republican, you couldn't run for political office in the South as a Republican.

Then you had your "Dixiecrats."

Your Republicans then were socially and fiscally conservative, but politically moderate to liberal.

It's after Reagan, that a Republican can actually run for office in the South and win. The defection of a number of Democrats to the Republican party helped that. For example, Jesse Helms, a Democrat defected to the Republican Party. I like him. I spent a day escorting him (and a British Member of Parliament and Bundestag member) around Germany looking at nuclear weapons facilities. He was on some kind of fact-finding mission apparently.

There are a lot of demographic changes taking place, too. For example, you had an wholesale shift of Capital in the US --- textiles from the New England States moved to the Southeast due to unions and oppressive State and local taxation and regulation; manufacturing flees the Midwest for nearly the same reason; and then technology leaves the East Coast and settles on the West Coast --- that was the cause of the recession during that period.

Once all the Capital has finally shifted and business and manufacturing are up and running again, the excess labor (not surplus labor) is re-absorbed, and then people are also leaving New England, the Atlantic Coast and the Midwest to resettle in the South.

That shift in demographics helped the Republicans capture States in the South in elections.

The Northern Liberals that come to the South drive the Religious Right out of the Democrat Party to the Republican Party.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawg82 View Post
As for Gandhi - there is a lot of myth to him that isn't the reality, but repainting him as gun-toting? That is a stretch.
Okay, maybe Gandhi didn't carry a piece, but his followers and supporters did --- and they carried out acts of violence, including political assassinations, so, shall split hairs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
In the 1960's Southern Democrats were the conservatives. MLK wanted radical progress , how in the world is that conservative?
MLK did not want radical progress. He met several times with the Eisenhower Administration to discuss issues. They had a plan to with a time-frame to shift policies and ease America along without creating culture shock and the violence that always comes with culture shock.

Perhaps if the plans made by MLK and Eisenhower had actually been put into effect on their time-table, MLK might still be alive.

Historically...

Mircea

 
Old 02-26-2013, 02:49 PM
 
Location: El Sereno, Los Angeles, CA
733 posts, read 940,227 times
Reputation: 428
It is ridiculous for facebook to ban a Gandhi quote, he did say it, doesn't exactly make him the gun toting NRA type either

As for MLK being a republican, he was a socialist as the article pointed out so I find it funny how people can think he's a conservative republican
 
Old 02-26-2013, 02:49 PM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,211,294 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
Ghandi said "Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."

Do you dispute this?
Doesn't make him a gun toting NRA type.

One quote doesn't define one man, only dishonest person would claim this.

 
Old 02-26-2013, 02:51 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,862,292 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Doesn't make him a gun toting NRA type.

One quote doesn't define one man, only dishonest person would claim this.
So being against gun confiscation makes you pro-violence?

That's hilarious, and ridiculously stupid.

Oppression and genocide (you know, like violence) are facilitated by the lack of a defense mechanism.

Nice try, but an utter failure.
 
Old 02-26-2013, 02:56 PM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,211,294 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
So being against gun confiscation makes you pro-violence?

That's hilarious, and ridiculously stupid.

Oppression and genocide (you know, like violence) are facilitated by the lack of a defense mechanism.

Nice try, but an utter failure.
So Gandhi supported gun rights, but he didn't support people using their guns, at least not in a violent fashion.

Now that is incredibly stupid
 
Old 02-26-2013, 02:58 PM
 
Location: El Sereno, Los Angeles, CA
733 posts, read 940,227 times
Reputation: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
What's the difference between Gandhi and John Gotti?

Where they lived.

Gotti would wave a friendly wave and smile a becoming smile, and all the while his henchmen were engaging in black-mail, extortion, fraud, money-laundering, drug smuggling, drug distribution, illegal gambling, graft, bribery, corruption, and many other other illegal and illicit acts......including the murder of others.

Gandhi was no different. Gandhi sat around all Buddha-like while his henchmen robbed banks, committed black-mail, extortion, fraud, money-laundering and assassinated public officials -- something you would call Terrorism™.



Well, yes and no. There's a lot of different takes on it.

I think you could say that the Nixon-Carter Era with McGovern et al is where the changes started.

The Democrat Party at that time consisted of Northern Liberals, uh, Socialists by any other name, and then Southern Democrats. The Southern Democrats then equate to the Religious Right today. Because of the Civil War and Lincoln being a Republican, you couldn't run for political office in the South as a Republican.

Then you had your "Dixiecrats."

Your Republicans then were socially and fiscally conservative, but politically moderate to liberal.

It's after Reagan, that a Republican can actually run for office in the South and win. The defection of a number of Democrats to the Republican party helped that. For example, Jesse Helms, a Democrat defected to the Republican Party. I like him. I spent a day escorting him (and a British Member of Parliament and Bundestag member) around Germany looking at nuclear weapons facilities. He was on some kind of fact-finding mission apparently.

There are a lot of demographic changes taking place, too. For example, you had an wholesale shift of Capital in the US --- textiles from the New England States moved to the Southeast due to unions and oppressive State and local taxation and regulation; manufacturing flees the Midwest for nearly the same reason; and then technology leaves the East Coast and settles on the West Coast --- that was the cause of the recession during that period.

Once all the Capital has finally shifted and business and manufacturing are up and running again, the excess labor (not surplus labor) is re-absorbed, and then people are also leaving New England, the Atlantic Coast and the Midwest to resettle in the South.

That shift in demographics helped the Republicans capture States in the South in elections.

The Northern Liberals that come to the South drive the Religious Right out of the Democrat Party to the Republican Party.



Okay, maybe Gandhi didn't carry a piece, but his followers and supporters did --- and they carried out acts of violence, including political assassinations, so, shall split hairs?



MLK did not want radical progress. He met several times with the Eisenhower Administration to discuss issues. They had a plan to with a time-frame to shift policies and ease America along without creating culture shock and the violence that always comes with culture shock.

Perhaps if the plans made by MLK and Eisenhower had actually been put into effect on their time-table, MLK might still be alive.

Historically...

Mircea
Just because these "assassins" also worked towards the Indian independence movement doesn't make them Gandhi's henchman or mean Gandhi had anything to do with it, that's like saying MLK ran the Black Panther party merely because he was in the civil rights movement. Different people were employing different means for roughly the same end happens all the time.

And MLK did advocate radical progress, radicalism is about applying fundamental change which is what MLK and anyone in their right mind would've advocated, just because he had a time table doesn't change the nature of what he was doing.
 
Old 02-26-2013, 03:01 PM
 
Location: University City, Philadelphia
22,632 posts, read 14,945,990 times
Reputation: 15935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Reminds me of 1984, War is Peace. Either these people know nothing about these two men or are in complete denial.
Are these Revisionists much different than those people who claim
  • The Holocaust never happened ...
  • The moon landing in 1969 was faked ...
  • 9/11 was orchestrated by the US Government ...
Inquiring minds want to know!
 
Old 02-26-2013, 03:02 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,464,526 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Reminds me of 1984, War is Peace. Either these people know nothing about these two men or are in complete denial.

Facebook bans Gandhi quote as part of revisionist history purge

Martin Luther King was a
Ghandi was a racist. Martin Luther King did hold some conservative views.
 
Old 02-26-2013, 03:05 PM
 
7,855 posts, read 10,291,736 times
Reputation: 5615
its possible to remake anyone

every so often on fox news , someone tells me that jesus had more or less identical politics to ronald reagan
 
Old 02-26-2013, 03:07 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,862,292 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Park View Post
Are these Revisionists much different than those people who claim
  • The Holocaust never happened ...
  • The moon landing in 1969 was faked ...
  • 9/11 was orchestrated by the US Government ...
Inquiring minds want to know!
As far as the Ghandi thing goes, the difference is that those people exist in the real world, not just in the minds of anti-gun trolls. Because the quote was accurate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top