Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The most strident homophobes always give these really graphic descriptions of sex acts that they attribute only to gay men (e.g., anal sex, teabagging, etc.). It's REALLY bizarre!!! Why spend time thinking of and describing people doing acts that supposedly gross you out? Of course, a student in a Psych 101 class could probably proffer the obvious answer to this question.
And how they seem to think that all same sex couples do is to have S*E*X.
You know, like none of them have jobs or have any of the normal responsibilities that straight couples have - cooking, the laundry, running errands, grocery shopping, all that mundane day-to-day stuff.
While I think that most agree that those most intimate and private moments are only a small part of a straight couple's overall relationship, these homophobes seem to think that same sex couples think about - and do - nothing but sex, sex, sex. All the time. And the more perverted, the better.
Geez, you'd think they never come up for air long enough to eat a meal by the way some of these homophobes and bigots talk!
They seem to think the whole "gay agenda" is to do noting but to have sex and to try to corrupt our youth and to destroy that most haloed of institutions - marriage.
But, you're right - there really is something weird about their fascination with gay sex.
It would actually be funny if it weren't so pathologically pathetic.
What narrow little lives they must lead to be so consumed by what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their homes.
So what? Gays are prevented to marry because of DOMA and individual State Constitutions. It took the voters to overturn that belief in 9 states, however their marriages are still not legally recognized federally.
It's interesting that you bring up individual states. Are you aware that the voters in California voted AGAINST homosexual marriage? For some odd reason, gays do not care about the voters voices in California, they only care about their own voices.
[qoute]They weren't prevented from "mixing" (they could interact with each other all they wanted). They were barred from marrying each other.[/quote]
Research Jim Craw laws. Jim Crow prevented race mixing period. That's why it was against the law for a black and white person to marry. The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws in the United States enacted between 1876 and 1965. They mandated de jure racial segregation in all public facilities in Southern states of the former Confederacy. Again, if blacks and whites could not use the same bathroom, they could certainly not be allowed to marry.
Quote:
Again you're hung up on the sex. A gay couple can be married and not have sex, so what does "act of sex" have to do with anything? Marriage isn't about sex. Its about love and support, and a couple doesn't need to engage in sex to show and have either.
When men and women have unprotected sex, conception usually occurs. Marriage when practiced correctly is a monogamous union, therefore, the man knows that the child conceived is his.
Quote:
And they weren't prevented from socializing (seeing as you'd have to, in order to business and do everyday things) They weren't allowed to get married.
Blacks and whites (of both genders) were barred from socializing. Even during the boycotts, white and black protesters were careful not to ride in the same cars, when attending various rallies. Those that decided to ride in the same cars risked losing their lives if they were stopped by the police in the South, because again, it was illegal for whites and blacks to mix.
Quote:
That was in particular to that CASE, which is why the statement was there. Why don't you just ignore the very first part of the quote, which applies to everyone (gay or straight): Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival
Marriage is not really a basic civil right of man. It's something that men and women do to show their commitment towards each other, especially when interested in starting a family.
In reality, every man and woman has the right to marry, as long as it is in accordance with the prevailing institution of marriage. Homosexuals however, want to redefine marriage, because they believe that marriage will help normalize homosexual relationships.
But it will never end with marriage. Soon, gays will be demanding that school curriculums teach children about same sex marriage under the guise of diversity. Again, people are opening up a pandora's box with this particular issue.
Quote:
Its not surprising that bigots can't see the obvious.
I'm not a bigot for following religious teachings that I believe in. Marriage is between a man and a woman.
Quote:
No they aren't. Marriage was never officially defined as between man and woman until DOMA was passed. So it was the heterosexuals who redefined marriage, not gays. Gays would like it to return to the ambiguous definition it had for nearly 50 years.
Really? LOL There's no need for me to even justify your statement.
Quote:
If you were prevented to marry the man you loved because say, he was Jewish and no woman but a Jewish woman could marry him according to law, wouldn't you feel as if you are being discriminated against, because you are not Jewish?
Well, you do realize that Judaism is a religion. This means that anyone can become a Jew, but obviously they have to believe in Judaism. There's a wealth of information available on this very subject. Anyhow, it's interesting that you mentioned this. A work associate, who happens to be black, recently converted to Judaism before marrying her long-term Jewish boyfriend.
Quote:
Against the law at the time. They were arrested, charged and had to endure a long trials, where their private lives were exposed to the world. The state wanted to catch them in the act of having sex, so they could put more charges on the couple, thereby adding to their "criminality".
The Lovings were accused of breaking the law, because under Jim Crow, they were not allowed to be together under the same roof, since she was black and he was white. That's really the crux of the issue.
Quote:
[indent]"Blacks and white were never meant to marry. They are going against Holy Scripture, and will bring devastation onto the this nation, if they were allowed to marry. Their unions will bring the downfall of society and create chaos, to which this nation will never recover from.
The reality is, monotheistic faiths are more about the individual's belief in God, and not about the racial identification. Thus it's really about the believers vs. the non believers.
Quote:
Several priests would disagree with you, since God's law also say to love, respect and support your neighbor, no matter who they are and what they do.
This is all true, but God's teachings also state that marriage is between a man and a woman. This means that any religious figure who marries a gay couple is going against the word of God, and redefining God's teachings.
I do believe in tolerance and the truth is, God knows best. I get a bit passionate about this topic, but I harbor no hatred for gay people. I simply do not believe that it's a good idea to redefine marriage.
Quote:
God was invented by man, by the rich and powerful to subjugate and control the poor and ignorant. He is a mythical creation, an imaginary sky daddy, who has as much power over humans, as your neighbor has over you.
I believe in the Lord, and I do not believe that He is a mythical creation. However you have a right to believe whatever you wish. The truth is, there is no compulsion in religion. The great thing about life is God has given us free will.
Most couples who engage in sex do not watch porn. Most couples who engage in anal sex, do not watch porn.
The porn industry shows exactly what happens between men and women, gays and bi sexuals.
you are so naive.
No, what porn does is distort sex. More than likely, you watch porn and just naturally assume that the material that you watch is normal, and that your average woman participates in those sex acts. The truth is, the majority of women do not engage in anal sex, or group sex.
Maybe not a majority but a heck of a lot of heterosexual women do engage in anal sex:
According to the Center for Disease Control, sexual behaviors among males and females aged 25–44, revealed that "36% of women and 44% of men ever had anal sex with an opposite-sex partner." http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
What's with your anal sex obsession anyway?
He stated that the majority of women engaged in anal sex, and I merely corrected him. Also, I am not really sure if those numbers are accurate. 36% seems like a very high percentage.
He stated that the majority of women engaged in anal sex, and I merely corrected him. Also, I am not really sure if those numbers are accurate. 36% seems like a very high percentage.
Oh well, if your opinion is that those numbers by the CDC are not accurate, then it must be true. What exactly is your problem with the methodology used to gather that data?
No, what porn does is distort sex. More than likely, you watch porn and just naturally assume that the material that you watch is normal, and that your average woman participates in those sex acts. The truth is, the majority of women do not engage in anal sex, or group sex.
The most strident homophobes always give these really graphic descriptions of sex acts that they attribute only to gay men (e.g., anal sex, teabagging, etc.). It's REALLY bizarre!!! Why spend time thinking of and describing people doing acts that supposedly gross you out? Of course, a student in a Psych 101 class could probably proffer the obvious answer to this question.
I stated that God created men and women to fit perfectly with each other, and someone stated that men and men actually fit quite well together. I followed up with the statement that men and men do not fit "well" and explained the purpose of the anus.
Someone then mentioned that the majority of women engage in anal sex. I corrected them and stated that the majority of women do not engage in anal sex. I also mentioned that the reason why he believes that anal sex is pervasive amongst heterosexual couples is because of the porn industry, but again, that is due to the fact that the porn industry is run by the same people who are behind gay marriage.
Are we reading the same thread.. You seem to keep asking, why am I mentioning these things, when I am merely responding to comments.
Why would you think that seems high? Because, in your narrow-minded little world, you can't believe that 36% of women have engaged in anal sex?
Don't knock it until you've tried it.
The issue is, anal sex causes bowel incontinence. Bowel incontinence is the loss of bowel control, leading to an involuntary passage of stool. This can range from occasionally leaking a small amount of stool and passing gas, to completely losing control of bowel movements. Once the anus is damaged it can not be repaired.
Also, from a public health perspective, it's very easy for disease and infection to be spread via the anus.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
