Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-04-2013, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,753,051 times
Reputation: 9330

Advertisements

I guess Duncan just didn't want to be outdone by Obama, so he came up with his own lies about Sequestration.

For about two weeks now Barack Obama has been engaged in a fear-mongering, propaganda war against the looming sequestration cuts that he supported and once promised to veto any attempt to reverse. We have heard everything from Social Security and welfare being cut, 800,ooo layoffs at the Pentagon if sequestration is allowed to happen, air traffic controllers and first responders being laid off, as well as people starving on the streets, border security being cut and an increased risk at a terrorist attack at home all because there is a scheduled 2% cut to the rate of increase in the federal government (I would say budget but there is none.) Rand Paul said it best when he said only in Washington can a spending increase be considered a spending decrease.

And then over the weekend Barack Obama’s Education Secretary, Arne Duncan, went of “Face the Nation” and made the claim that teachers are already being laid off in anticipation of the sequester:
"There are literally teachers now who are getting pink slips, who are getting notices that they can’t come back this fall"
He said “literally” teachers are already feeling the effects of sequester, not theoretically or potentially but when pressed on this the next day he admitted he didn’t know if the layoffs he was citing had anything to do with the sequester and it turns out they do not.
The major impact is not so much sequestration,” she said. “Those five or six jobs would already be gone regardless of sequestration
And the kicker is the fact that the Obama regime is actually responsible for these layoffs:
In addition, the county notified all of its Head Start teachers that they may be out of a job, not because of sequestration, but because the Obama administration had recently labeled the Kanawha County program “deficient”, a designation that requires it to compete for funding instead of getting an automatic renewal.

Barack Obama’s Education Secretary caught lying about sequestration teacher layoffs | America's Watchtower

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top