Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think there are going to be outraged liberals and members of the media in a few months. They will find their incessant cheerleading for this deviency beaten back by one they least suspect, Sotomayor.
There is no "right to marry", if one needs permission (license).
If one needs a marriage license, it is not a right, secured by constitutional government.
It is a privilege granted by government.
However, those who hold common law standing can contract a common law marriage.
Guess what changed so that "everyone" must get permission to contract marriage?
There is a right to marriage. What gays want is to do redefine marriage. However society has every right to determine what marriage means to them and as the justices alluded to today we are talking about 5 years of data vs 2000 years if traditional marriage and that's just in Christendom.
DOMA and Prop 8 are upheld IMHO although Prop 8 being invalidated wouldn't shock me.
This is a likely outcome. Although I could also see Prop 8 being upheld.
From what I'm hearing, the justices are highly skeptical of the Prop 8 proponents' claim to standing, which is why there's a good chance that the Ninth Circuit ruling will be allowed to stand.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.