Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2013, 11:36 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,630,499 times
Reputation: 9676

Advertisements

I reckon religious conservatives want to use state government to get it across to homosexuals that what they do is a criminal act. Neither mind heterosexuals who indulge it with the opposite sex.

Why Do Virginia, 13 Other States Want To Keep Their Anti-Sodomy Laws A Decade After SCOTUS Ban?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2013, 11:41 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Doesnt matter.. The Supreme Court ruling renders the laws unenforceable. Most of us learned this in elementary school.

The fact that the laws are on the books, simply means there was no need to go through the steps to remove them..

Care to share with me how many people have been jailed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 11:49 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,630,499 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Doesnt matter.. The Supreme Court ruling renders the laws unenforceable. Most of us learned this in elementary school.

The fact that the laws are on the books, simply means there was no need to go through the steps to remove them..

Care to share with me how many people have been jailed?
Such laws are useful for harassing homosexuals. To quote from the article:

"....anti-sodomy laws are far from meaningless relics. In 2008, North Carolina used its statute to arrest two men who had engaged in consensual sex. (The charges were later dropped.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 11:53 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
Such laws are useful for harassing homosexuals. To quote from the article:

"....anti-sodomy laws are far from meaningless relics. In 2008, North Carolina used its statute to arrest two men who had engaged in consensual sex. (The charges were later dropped.) And in 2011, police in El Paso, Texas, kicked a pair of gay men out of a Mexican restaurant for "homosexual conduct." No citation was ever issued."
There are lots of laws on the books used to "harass" individuals. Tell me how removing them, stops the harrassment?

I once was threatened with being arrested for sticking up my middle finger, despite the Supreme Court ruling that its first amendment speech. I've also fought my township over dumping soil in my yard without permission, despite the fact that FEMA declared the area a flood zone and issued a permit to do so, and the federal government ruled townships didnt have jurisdiction.

Governments harrass, its what they do, and why I object to big brother non stop. Look at California, and their removal of marijuana laws, but that doesnt stop people from being arrested for smoking it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2013, 12:05 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,630,499 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
There are lots of laws on the books used to "harass" individuals. Tell me how removing them, stops the harrassment?
People need to say NO to harrassment. At least, hopefully, unjust harassment doesn't lead to prison time.

Meanwhile, Montana, Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas still have laws specifically outlawing sodomy between homosexuals. It will be interesting to see if those states will bother dropping those laws before they decide it's legally ok to issue same sex marriage licenses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2013, 12:06 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,003,249 times
Reputation: 6128
I think that the states probally have more pressing issues to deal with than officially repealing an unenforceable law.

The lefties must be bored.

They sure are starting a lot of pointless threads tonight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2013, 12:19 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,630,499 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
I think that the states probally have more pressing issues to deal with than officially repealing an unenforceable law.
Yeah state conservative legislators need to get on the ball and ban UN Agenda 21, Sharia law, make more strict immigration laws, and issue a resolution to the U. S. Supreme Court in support of marriage as only meaning between one man and one woman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2013, 04:55 AM
 
Location: McKinleyville, California
6,414 posts, read 10,490,590 times
Reputation: 4305
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
Yeah state conservative legislators need to get on the ball and ban UN Agenda 21, Sharia law, make more strict immigration laws, and issue a resolution to the U. S. Supreme Court in support of marriage as only meaning between one man and one woman.
I see, the intent if your thread, it is anti gay marriage. We do not need a resolution creating more discrimination. DOMA is already that and is ruled unconstitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2013, 05:03 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,941,561 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
I think that the states probally have more pressing issues to deal with than officially repealing an unenforceable law.

The lefties must be bored.

They sure are starting a lot of pointless threads tonight.
Yea, this thread is BS...Im gonna go post some more on that had hitting thread "Is AF 1 a civilian airliner???"

That thread is so much less boring. I got a ton of regurgitated one-liner jabs yet to use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2013, 05:06 AM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,860,561 times
Reputation: 1517
Really?

These laws are not enforced. There are all kinds of ridiculous laws still on the books from two hundred years ago that no one has bothered to repeal.

I think you're just looking for something to get up in arms about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top