Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-18-2013, 06:24 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,216,244 times
Reputation: 3411

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WIHS2006 View Post
IMO the overreaction is absurd. Back in the days of common sense if there was a suspicious package a cop would open it and see what it was - if it contained an actual bomb then they called for the bomb squad. One cop, one cop car not 5000000000000000000000000 cop cars, SWAT trucks, bomb squad vans, fire trucks, etc over a bag containing someone's lunch.
Well....if the bomb was triggered by movement or if the officer went up to check it out at exactly the wrong time, then the cop would have been in little pieces, along with everyone else in the immediate area. It's not safe to do that. Do some of you have any common sense at all?

I'm not sure what you people want. A bunch of people here were screaming about HS incompetence because of the Boston bombing, but you don't want law enforcement to check out potential situations that they DO identify. A good example is the bomb found in a backpack on a parade route in Spokane. If someone hadn't noticed that there was an unattended backpack and notified the police, that could have turned out a whole lot like Boston did. You guys don't get it both ways. If someone had noticed those unattended bags along the route in Boston, they would have shut down the race and people would have initially grumbled, but a tragedy would have been averted. Terrorist activities are a reality in this country now, and over the last 10 years we've done a good job of stopping the vast majority of them. I'd rather be patient and put up with the occasional delay for a false alarm vs. being killed.

2011 Spokane bombing attempt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-18-2013, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,304,251 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
I never said anyone should roll over and accept it. Quite the reverse- we must not accept it, either from without or within our borders. A false alarm is better than no alarm.
No it's not. Not when thousands of false alarms costs the American people billions of dollars in lost productivity. Life goes on and life has risks. Stop hiding in mommy's basement and get out in the sunshine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 07:13 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,131,949 times
Reputation: 8527
Short memory syndrome? It was abandoned backpacks that held explosives in Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,175 posts, read 26,232,733 times
Reputation: 27919
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
No it's not. Not when thousands of false alarms costs the American people billions of dollars in lost productivity. Life goes on and life has risks. Stop hiding in mommy's basement and get out in the sunshine.
That's the intent and effectiveness of terrorism
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,304,251 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
That's the intent and effectiveness of terrorism
ding ding ding we have a weiner.

Terrorism works extremely well on timid, panicky scared-to-die Americans who have limited ability to properly assess risk in their daily life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 07:37 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,576,981 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
ding ding ding we have a weiner.

Terrorism works extremely well on timid, panicky scared-to-die Americans who have limited ability to properly assess risk in their daily life.
And any tragic event is followed with "terrorism ?"
I guess there can not be any accidents anymore ?

Referring to this fertilizer blast in West, Tx.
Tragic but more than likely an industrial accident.
Yet..the question arose.."Could this be an act of terrorism ?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,175 posts, read 26,232,733 times
Reputation: 27919
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
And any tragic event is followed with "terrorism ?"
I guess there can not be any accidents anymore ?

Referring to this fertilizer blast in West, Tx.
Tragic but more than likely an industrial accident.
Yet..the question arose.."Could this be an act of terrorism ?"
Understandable that the thought would at least come up simply because of the timing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 07:47 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,576,981 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
Understandable that the thought would at least come up simply because of the timing.
It's beyond "timing". This question is now asked about any tragic event.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,175 posts, read 26,232,733 times
Reputation: 27919
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It's beyond "timing". This question is now asked about any tragic event.
I won't disagree if you say that 'some people ' do so but will disagree with the 'any tragic event' even among those people.
It's an aversion to any and all generaizations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,576,981 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
I won't disagree if you say that 'some people ' do so but will disagree with the 'any tragic event' even among those people.
It's an aversion to any and all generaizations.
It's coming from our own government.

Senator Claire McCaskill grills Homeland Security boss Janet Napolitano on why Boston bombings are labeled terrorism but mass shootings like the one at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. are not* - NY Daily News
An exasperated Senator questioned Wednesday why tragedies like the Boston bombings are labeled acts of terror, but mass shootings like last year's in Newtown, Conn. are not.

"The irony is that we are so quick to call Boston terror," Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), said. "Why aren't we calling the man with the high-capacity assault weapon and the high-capacity magazine — why aren't we calling him a terrorist?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top