Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The press supports dangerous speech even though it most certainly caused the bombers to become more radical and also gave them the ideas how to build bombs. But they will not support the second amendment. So if free speech causes death, that's just the price of freedom but if a gun causes death, we need to get rid of it. LOL The left is looney.
What does a WELL REGULATED militia have to do with fighting against universal background checks, which help keep criminals and crazy people from easily and conveniently buying guns at shows and from privately advertised sales?
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,087,778 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547
What does a WELL REGULATED militia have to do with fighting against universal background checks, which help keep criminals and crazy people from easily and conveniently buying guns at shows and from privately advertised sales?
Unfortunately you are peeing into the wind to ask the OP that question.
The press supports dangerous speech even though it most certainly caused the bombers to become more radical and also gave them the ideas how to build bombs. But they will not support the second amendment. So if free speech causes death, that's just the price of freedom but if a gun causes death, we need to get rid of it. LOL The left is looney.
The press did no such thing. Have you heard of the internet or do you live under a rock Do you want to know how to build a bomb or make meth or whatever..... The internet has it all, no press needed.
What does a WELL REGULATED militia have to do with fighting against universal background checks, which help keep criminals and crazy people from easily and conveniently buying guns at shows and from privately advertised sales?
The 2nd Amendment does not say that the right is predicated on membership in a well regulated militia. The right is identified as "the right of the people."
Imagine if the 1st Amendment had been written as "a well-educated citizenry being necessary to the success of a democratic state, the right of the people to own and read books shall not be infringed." Would you interpret that as limiting the right to only people with diplomas? Compare that to the wording of the 2nd amendment--the construction is exactly parallel.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do you want to know how to build a bomb or make meth or whatever..... The internet has it all, no press needed.
