Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-30-2013, 05:28 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finley01 View Post
Yep.....the Republicans are either too dumb or too hard headed to acknowledge it. The official debt only increased $18 billion in fy 1999 which officially ended Sept. 30th 2000. That was during a period when nearly $100 billion was used to buy back existing debt.

09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38(Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
I see the banned poster melvin.george continues his spin

fact debt is debt

debt owed publicly and then bought by the government itself is still debt

NOT ONE PENNY WAS PAID TOWARDS the debt in the 90's by the clinton admin..he NEVER SAW A REAL SURPLUS

a SuRPLUS that is SPENT is a DEFICIT and a DEBT


too bad the fascist liberals are too dumb to understand basic accounting
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-30-2013, 05:38 PM
 
Location: New Hampshire
1,137 posts, read 1,398,704 times
Reputation: 1236
I wonder which of our 57 states the Obama library will be in.

Obama library? Seriously?

File this one under "who gives A F***?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2013, 05:38 PM
 
107 posts, read 116,760 times
Reputation: 75
No.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2013, 05:42 PM
 
196 posts, read 115,692 times
Reputation: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
I see the banned poster melvin.george continues his spin

fact debt is debt

debt owed publicly and then bought by the government itself is still debt

NOT ONE PENNY WAS PAID TOWARDS the debt in the 90's by the clinton admin..he NEVER SAW A REAL SURPLUS

a SuRPLUS that is SPENT is a DEFICIT and a DEBT


too bad the fascist liberals are too dumb to understand basic accounting
Hell....ban me again. I'm used to right wingers who can't stand the heat taking me out. Beginning in 1994 when I purchased my first desk top I've posted on dozens of forums or boards using over 150 mail names. I know you don't like what I say so go ahead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2013, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
fact debt is debt

debt owed publicly and then bought by the government itself is still debt

NOT ONE PENNY WAS PAID TOWARDS the debt in the 90's by the clinton admin..he NEVER SAW A REAL SURPLUS

a SuRPLUS that is SPENT is a DEFICIT and a DEBT


too bad the fascist liberals are too dumb to understand basic accounting
As I said prior, it's really splitting hairs. What Finley01 said is true, debt by your measure increased by only $18 billion in fy 1999. Considering that GDP grew from $9.4 trillion to $10 trillion in 2000, that additional debt was meaningless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2013, 10:15 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finley01 View Post
Hell....ban me again. I'm used to right wingers who can't stand the heat taking me out. Beginning in 1994 when I purchased my first desk top I've posted on dozens of forums or boards using over 150 mail names. I know you don't like what I say so go ahead.
so you admit you are a troll, and purposly flame the boards
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2013, 02:41 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
Glitch,

I see what you are saying, but you are off a little

yes newt ballanced the budget, yes clinton faught it, yes they had PROJECTED budget surpluses, but those projected surpluses got SPENT on other things, therefore WIPING OUT the surplus, makng a deficit
That did not happen until 2001, and you are right, we had a mild recession that began in 2000, combined with a tax cut in May 2001, combined with the 09/11/01 attack, and all that resulted in a deficit for that year. I never believe anything coming from DC when it is "projected," particularly when it is over a 10 year period.

Nevertheless, during fiscal years 1998, 1999, and 2000 the GOP controlled Congress had an actual (not "projected") budget surplus. Again, all that means is Congress spent less than they originally budgeted. It does not mean it lowered the National Debt, which it obviously did not. The surplus was never "spent" because there was never enough revenue in the first place. Revenues were below what Congress actually spent, and even though what they spent was less than what they budgeted, there was still no money. Which is why the principle on the National Debt for those fiscal years increased, it just did not increase at as fast a pace as it had been.


Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
when actually...If Congress budgets $3.8 trillion, and only spends $3.7 trillion, and revenues are only $2.8 trillion, then Congress has a projected 1 trillion dollar deficit, but ends up with a real $900 billion DEFICIT while also increasing the National Debt by $900 billion
True. At the time Congress enacts the budget, everything is projected. It is only after the fiscal year ends that actual revenues and expenditures are counted to provide an actual surplus or deficit. Unlike every household that first obtains their revenue THEN makes a budget, Congress first makes a budget THEN collects the revenue. More often than not, the two are never the same.

Last edited by Glitch; 05-01-2013 at 02:50 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2013, 05:01 AM
 
Location: 77441
3,160 posts, read 4,367,490 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
An outhouse with a golf club in the corner......

Will it be in Kenya, Indonesia, or Hawaii?



Edit: Rick, we think alike. I didn't see that pic. Hilarious.

there will be 4 entire wings dedicated to homosexual love and all of obama's partners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2013, 05:20 AM
 
196 posts, read 115,692 times
Reputation: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
As I said prior, it's really splitting hairs. What Finley01 said is true, debt by your measure increased by only $18 billion in fy 1999. Considering that GDP grew from $9.4 trillion to $10 trillion in 2000, that additional debt was meaningless.
And what most of them don't seem to know is that fiscal years run from Oct. 1 of the dated year till Sept. 30th of the next. In other words Clinton's last budget officially ended after Bush had been in office nearly nine months. By the same token Bush's last budget year didn't end till Sept. 30th of 2009 after Obama took over. It's been the way the government ran it's business, all departments and offices nation wide for as long as I can remember.

George W. Bush assumed a surplus after the congress had been arguing about how to use the excesses and solved their problems for them. He cut tax rates for the wealthy not once but twice using reconciliation to block opposition from Democrats. Then he started two wars and doubled the national debt. I might also mention that one of the wars was undeniably unnecessary and both were unfunded being financed by emergency spending bills. The absolute worst presidency in my lifetime.....'course I'm just 78.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2013, 08:16 AM
 
1,364 posts, read 1,929,238 times
Reputation: 1111
I think they should donate a hip hop rave club to president poopiepants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top