Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-02-2013, 05:08 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by readyjack View Post
When you agree to go on school grounds by going on school grounds, you are agreeing that you can be searched under reasonable suspicion. We had a search just about every year at my high school. Everyone had to open there lockers and then be escorted to the car. So maybe it doesn't throw the constitution out, but it certainly puts it in the bottom drawer.
The lockers arent yours, thereby they are more than allowed to search them whenever you want. I dont buy the story about the searching of the cars, sorry.. Never heard of that in my entire life.

The ACLU says you're wrong as well
http://www.acluutah.org/SKYR4.html

Student cars parked in a school parking lot are subject to search. Courts have said that police can search a car without a warrant in the school parking lot, because there was probable cause to believe they would find evidence of a crime. In that case, the school first allowed police officers to bring dogs in to sniff lockers for drugs. Next, the dogs sniffed in the parking lot, and alerted the officers to a specific car. Police officers opened and searched the vehicle and found drug paraphernalia inside. Since the police had probable cause after the dog sniffed the car, it was okay to search the car even though the student was inside the school.72

With probable cause, the POLICE, (not the school) can search the cars, without it, its private property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-02-2013, 05:11 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Public schools?

Who is the "they" in the phrase "that's their property"?

If we use a California public school as a hypothetical, the "they" includes me, because all California public schools belong to California citizens, especially taxpayers.

In Raliegh, it would be the property of the people of North Carolina.
The property is the schools, the fact that you may or may not be a taxpayer, doesnt dimish the ownership of lockers that arent yours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2013, 05:13 AM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,553,151 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
It wasnt that long ago that DC had no gun rules as well.
and?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2013, 05:19 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,560,902 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
If this kid was star athlete I bet the school would have looked the other way.
Sadly, I must agree that this is a possibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2013, 05:23 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
If this kid was star athlete I bet the school would have looked the other way.
The school does have a lot of discretion on deciding if they should expell, or suspend the students. They are allowed to consider the intent of the "crime".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2013, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,229,657 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
I'm no gun fan but "rules are rules" is the STUPIDEST argument for anything you can use. Rules without logic and reason are way more dangerous than that gun. I learned long ago that every RULE had exceptions, that's why I'm against most of them unless they are broad and used along side human thought and logic rather than INSTEAD OF. I'm against all rules that tie anyones hands and let them say "there is nothing I can do...rules is rules". What a STUPID society we are when that becomes ok.
I agree completely. Which is why I said that his parents should have been allowed to come get the gun. But the OP asked who was wrong, and who broke the law. The kid broke the school rules, so technically he was in the wrong, and he broke the law. Honestly, if I were the kid, I would have kept my mouth shut about it even being there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2013, 06:07 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,952,073 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
I agree completely. Which is why I said that his parents should have been allowed to come get the gun. But the OP asked who was wrong, and who broke the law. The kid broke the school rules, so technically he was in the wrong, and he broke the law. Honestly, if I were the kid, I would have kept my mouth shut about it even being there.
Having the parents pick up the gun doesnt change the fact that he had the gun. I think whom has possesion of the gun after the fact is the least of anyone's worries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2013, 06:12 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,129,026 times
Reputation: 8527
Another idiot with a gun.

And in other news...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2013, 06:17 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,148,098 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Another idiot with a gun.

And in other news...
You hate guns and gun owners.....why don't you just say it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2013, 06:18 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,129,026 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
You hate guns and gun owners.....why don't you just say it?

Nope, I own guns myself. What I "hate" are the idiots who are not RESPONSIBLE gun owners. You know the ones I'm talking about...the drunk hunters who accidentally blow somebody's appendage off, the morons who think shooting their gun in the air during celebrations is a good idea, the idiots who don't keep their guns away from their kids, those who don't educate their kids at a young age about gun safety, the parents who think allowing a 5 year old kid to run around with a loaded rifle is no big deal, those who forget they have a rifle in their trunk when they go to school. You know, those guys.

They make the rest of us look bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top