Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-16-2013, 12:23 AM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,783,417 times
Reputation: 2374

Advertisements

I wonder where this report came from.

It appears that in August 2012 Ambassador Stevens requested security upgrades in writing (cable) to US military (General Ham?), but shortly thereafter when General Ham spoke to Stevens, Stevens turned down additional security. Stevens, during a second conversation with General Ham, again turned down additional security. If indeed this is true, since it's verbal, see below for the possible reason.

Quote:
A report today contends that Ambassador Christopher Stevens inexplicably twice rejected offers for security upgrades at the U.S. operation in Benghazi, Libya, in just the few weeks before he died.

McClatchy Foreign Staff writer Nancy Youssef wrote from Cairo that “two government officials” said that Stevens, who had raised concerns over security at Benghazi in writing, turned down two verbal offers of additional security from Army Gen. Carter Ham, now retired but then head of the U.S. Africa Command.

“He didn’t say why. He just turned it down,” the news organization said a “defense official who asked not to be identified” confirmed.

Such refusals previously have not been reported in the growing scandal over how there was a known danger to Americans in that location, but the federal government did little to help, and then nothing at all when the al-Qaida-linked terrorists attacked on Sept. 11, 2012

But the report noted “one person familiar with the events” suggested a rejection from Stevens would have been following “an understanding within the State Department that officials in Libya ought not to request more security, in part because of concerns about the political fallout of seeking a larger military presence in a country that was still being touted as a foreign policy success.
Report says Stevens turned down security offer

Was General Ham prepared to provide the extra security? Does General Ham know the reason(s) why Stevens changed his mind??? There had to be some exchange, at least when Ham and Stevens were face-to-face, as to why the request in the first place, then declining the offer twice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top