Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-17-2013, 04:36 AM
 
26,503 posts, read 15,084,039 times
Reputation: 14662

Advertisements

Obama was going to be the most transparent president ever. He has repeatedly had to be a deceptive president.

Why won't he release the emails from the first two days? It seems like those would be the most critical to determining what happened? As Obama says:


Obama Speaks... - YouTube


President Obama, what are you hiding in these tapes, errr... emails.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-17-2013, 04:38 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,243,959 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Why would Obama refuse to release the first 2 days of emails on Benghazi?
Classified information, secret or top secret, need to know basis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2013, 04:40 AM
 
26,503 posts, read 15,084,039 times
Reputation: 14662
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
Classified information, secret or top secret, need to know basis.
They can redact like the others. They can release to congressmen who have that clearance but not to the media.

What is Obama hiding?

RELEASE THE TAPES. RELEASE THE TAPES. RELEASE THE TAPES!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2013, 04:47 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,547,733 times
Reputation: 6392
They're very worried about Benghazi as the whole thing likely makes the President appear to be supporting terrorists in the middle east.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2013, 04:51 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,204,998 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
They can redact like the others. They can release to congressmen who have that clearance but not to the media.

What is Obama hiding?

RELEASE THE TAPES. RELEASE THE TAPES. RELEASE THE TAPES!
They also have to have the need to know in addition to the appropriate clearance, and in Obama's world no one has the need to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2013, 04:56 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,243,959 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
They can redact like the others. They can release to congressmen who have that clearance but not to the media.

What is Obama hiding?

RELEASE THE TAPES. RELEASE THE TAPES. RELEASE THE TAPES!
The problems with that is congress-persons cannot be trusted to keep from leaking information that isn't supposed to be leaked.

Quote:
The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank caught an interesting tidbit from yesterday’s House hearing on the attacks on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya last month. The GOP — having spent months railing against the Obama administration for allegedly leaking classified information — yesterday revealed classified information. “When House Republicans called a hearing in the middle of their long recess, you knew it would be something big,” Milbank reports today, “and indeed it was: They accidentally blew the CIA’s cover.”
Republicans Reveal Location Of Secret CIA Base During House Hearing On Libya Attacks | ThinkProgress
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2013, 05:46 AM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,784,658 times
Reputation: 2374
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
The problems with that is congress-persons cannot be trusted to keep from leaking information that isn't supposed to be leaked.


Republicans Reveal Location Of Secret CIA Base During House Hearing On Libya Attacks | ThinkProgress
Your link is from October 2012 pertaining to the first hearing.

Charlene Lamb had two aerial photos she wanted to refer to during the hearing. She only got to showing one of them identifying the annex and the compound (for the purpose of distance) and was asked by the committee if the photos were classified or unclassified. She was told not to use them.

Last edited by softblueyz; 05-17-2013 at 05:58 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2013, 05:49 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,038,973 times
Reputation: 3603
He's hiding information. Period. His Wh has not cooperated from day one. Its been 8 months and nearly all documents and emails have not been released.

And no, its not.because of classification, some in DC said many docs are unclassified.

Obamas own words are against him here. He is hiding and holding back info, that means he is hiding something. Amazing how you stupid liberals continue to defend this. My God, if he and the State Dept could clear themselves, they would release ALL information. They refuse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2013, 05:50 AM
 
26,503 posts, read 15,084,039 times
Reputation: 14662
NoJiveMan,
I sort of agree with you. Yes Richard Nixon used the claim that he couldn't release the tapes for national security reasons and that you couldn't trust congress etc...executive privilege, etc...

However, that tactic didn't work for Richard Nixon, because the people believed that if he wouldn't release the tapes it meant that he had something to hide.

I don't know why you are defending Richard Nixon's right to have kept the tapes secret - it is for the better of the country that sun light was shone on the corruption to disinfect it.

Release the Tapes!

Release the first two days of emails!

Nixon and Obama what are they trying to hide?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2013, 05:51 AM
 
15,533 posts, read 10,507,413 times
Reputation: 15813
They hand picked the emails they wanted to release, what a JOKE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top