Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2013, 02:18 AM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,231,741 times
Reputation: 3225

Advertisements

Why does the government let people use it for recreational, medical, and industrial purposes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2013, 02:34 AM
 
9,229 posts, read 9,763,680 times
Reputation: 3316
Because it is an acceptable tradition? Any law has to consider social norms and conventions.

Alcohol is not necessarily bad either, as long as you are not addicted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 02:36 AM
 
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
744 posts, read 1,092,114 times
Reputation: 871
Because it's delicious, nutritious, and a long work week doesn't feel quite complete without several refreshing pints on a Friday night at your local bar, pub, or club. I would stay away from cheap American pisswater pale lagers, however. Stick to craft brews or Belgian/German/English ales.

(Also, keep alcohol away from red state conservatives, who tend to be irresponsible with drugs, alcohol, and firearms. Dick Cheney and Dumbya Bush = 4 DUI arrests between them. Dick Cheney shot his friend in the face! It's little wonder why half the counties in deep red states prohibit the sale of alcohol)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 02:47 AM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,481,895 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
Why does the government let people use it for recreational, medical, and industrial purposes?
Because the government realized the absurdity of making it illegal and the futility/waste of having a bureaucracy employed for the purpose of pursuing, prosecuting, and imprisoning 'offenders'.

[sounds familiar, eh?]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 03:01 AM
 
35,094 posts, read 51,266,619 times
Reputation: 62669
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
Why does the government let people use it for recreational, medical, and industrial purposes?

Do a search for Prohibition, the answers to all of your questions will be found.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 03:36 AM
 
Location: SoCal & Mid-TN
2,325 posts, read 2,653,455 times
Reputation: 2874
It's the least they can do considering how screwed up things are
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 04:04 AM
 
Location: Wilsonville, OR
1,261 posts, read 2,147,182 times
Reputation: 2361
Because it's been around so long, everyone thinks it's good, acceptable, and desirable by default. This is a logical fallacy known as appeal to tradition. In reality, it causes a tremendous amount of personal and social strife, far more than illegal drugs like marijuana ever have, can, or will. Ever. The hypocrisy involved is almost exquisite.

That being said, it does feel good to use and I don't believe most people intend to abuse it. And of course it should remain legal. Just look at what happened during prohibition!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 04:55 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,245,092 times
Reputation: 2279
This.
Quote:
The Cullen-Harrison Act, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on March 22, 1933, authorized the sale of 3.2% beer (thought to be too low an alcohol concentration to be intoxicating) and wine, with the first legal beer sales since the beginning of Prohibition on January 16, 1920. In 1933, the state conventions ratified the Twenty-first Amendment, which repealed the 18th Amendment. The amendment was fully ratified on December 5, 1933. Federal laws enforcing Prohibition were then repealed.
You can prohibit man's vices, but, just as the war on drugs has proven, anything prohibiting people from consuming or using the vices would be a failure.

Quote:
A speakeasy, also called a blind pig or blind tiger, is an establishment that illegally sells alcoholic beverages that came into prominence in the United States during the Prohibition era (1920–1933, longer in some states). During that time, the sale, manufacture, and transportation (bootlegging) of alcoholic beverages was illegal throughout the United States. Speakeasies largely disappeared after Prohibition was lifted in 1933.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laudanum#History
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 05:03 AM
 
Location: Lower east side of Toronto
10,564 posts, read 12,825,816 times
Reputation: 9400
If taking small doses of a deadly poison created a sense of well being and that toxin had been around for a thousand years- and used by humans traditionally it would be considered normal. I mentioned to an older woman who enjoyed large amounts of alcohol all of her life ..that alcohol was a poisonous substance and the high was actually a mild poisoning...She was offended and disagreed..Then I mentioned to her that she was intoxicated. I said booze was a toxin - that it was toxic- and she was intoxicated.

If alcohol was suddenly to appear for the first time as a new designer drug - It would be banned and not allowed on the market because of the serious side effects. It would be illegal...and classed as a poison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 05:07 AM
 
Location: 'greater' Buffalo, NY
5,494 posts, read 3,934,268 times
Reputation: 7494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oleg Bach View Post
If taking small doses of a deadly poison created a sense of well being and that toxin had been around for a thousand years- and used by humans traditionally it would be considered normal. I mentioned to an older woman who enjoyed large amounts of alcohol all of her life ..that alcohol was a poisonous substance and the high was actually a mild poisoning...She was offended and disagreed..Then I mentioned to her that she was intoxicated. I said booze was a toxin - that it was toxic- and she was intoxicated.

If alcohol was suddenly to appear for the first time as a new designer drug - It would be banned and not allowed on the market because of the serious side effects. It would be illegal...and classed as a poison.
Why say that? We're all slowly committing suicide. Alcohol is a good way of temporarily forgetting that fact. Don't be a buzzkill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top