Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
or they will do worse.
This is the Free Syrian Army (rebels) that are the proxy's being used to topple Assad.
Quote:
In an interview with the BBC, FSA fighter Abu Sakkar, who prompted international condemnation back in May when video emerged of him cutting off and eating the internal organ of a Syrian Army soldier as his comrades chanted “Allahu Akbar,” is unrepentant and actually threatens to commit more gruesome acts unless the Obama administration sends the rebels heavy weapons.
Pillorying the west for doing nothing to help the rebels, Sakkar complains, “If we don’t get help, a no-fly zone, heavy weapons, we will do worse [than I did]. You’ve seen nothing yet.”
Sakkar’s act of cannibalism served to confirm that both Obama and Prime Minister David Cameron were seeking to arm some of the most violent and extreme jihadists in the region, prompting Vladimir Putin to remark, “These are people who don’t just kill their enemies, they open up their bodies, and eat their intestines in front of the public and the cameras. Are these the people you want to… supply with weapons?”
Despite FSA leaders promising to bring him to justice, Sakkar is still a free man months later giving interviews with major international media organizations, again illustrating how rebel promises to expunge their ranks of extremists are nothing more than hot air. The BBC’s Paul Wood goes a long way to pardoning Sakkar for his heart-eating antics, fixating on unproven claims that the victim was a rapist and that Sakkar had a tough life.
The comments of the heart-eating cannibal again underscores the lunacy of the policy recently embarked upon by the Obama administration – sending heavy weaponry to militant jihadists who commit atrocities in Syria on a routine basis.
Which ever side the Muslim Bortherhood is on, that's the side Obama is on. So I take it that Assad is on the opposing side of the the Muslim Brotherhood?
Which ever side the Muslim Bortherhood is on, that's the side Obama is on. So I take it that Assad is on the opposing side of the the Muslim Brotherhood?
but the heart-eater was not Muslim Brotherhood???
I'm confused.
Assad is a Ba'athist.
Obum**** is on the side of the heart eater. That and the dumb ass McCain
So is the heart-eater part of the Muslim Brotherhood or the FSA? still confused.
Either way Obama is on the wrong side of things as usual.
The two are not mutually exclusive. the MB have been waiting in the wings since their last uprising against Hafez Al-Assad.
And it's not just Obama - McCain has been leading the charge.........
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
