Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475
I don't see how that matters. What needs to be figured out is how much is a human life worth? (...)
|
A human life is worth the minimum marginal cost of saving a human life, all else equal.
If (for example) $100 million more of medical research funding can lead to 50,000 lives saved every year starting in 7 years, rather than starting in 20 years without that extra funding, then it costs $153.85 per saved life to fund the research. If the research required $10 billion, this increases to $15,385.
It is absurd to spend $100,000 to prolong the life of a 93-year-old hooked up to tubes and a ventilator when you can save many many lives for the same money by investing in medical research.
If you funded the same cost of medical research *instead of* the life support, you would basically be netting a large number of saved lives for free.
And this doesn't even account for the fact that in many cases, a cut in military budget could actually save lives for a cost less than zero (i.e. stop killing people.....)
The fact that there isn't more outrage over this means one thing: this country is F'ed up beyond hope.